52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus for agents with general dynamics using optimistic optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…?.iii) that shrink with the depth in the tree (??.ii). 1 Denote δ(d) = cγ d , the maximal diameter at depth d. DOO works by always partitioning further a set that is likely to contain the optimum of r. It does this by assigning upper bounds to all leaf sets U d,j , (d, j) ∈ L:…”
Section: Assumption 3 (Optimization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…?.iii) that shrink with the depth in the tree (??.ii). 1 Denote δ(d) = cγ d , the maximal diameter at depth d. DOO works by always partitioning further a set that is likely to contain the optimum of r. It does this by assigning upper bounds to all leaf sets U d,j , (d, j) ∈ L:…”
Section: Assumption 3 (Optimization)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is also related to model-predictive control, which was applied to the consensus of linear agents in [12,6]. Our existing work includes [2], where we gave a different approach without analysis; and [1], which is a preliminary version of the present work. With respect to [1], here we introduce novel analysis that includes: using the deterministic OO algorithm, handling directed graphs, and a detailed investigation of the computational aspects; while the examples are also new.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%