Consensus development methods: Considerations for national and global frameworks and policy development

Arakawa, Naoko; Bader, Lina

doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.024

Cited by 27 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Methodology of this consensus process was in line with recent recommendations [11] and was initiated in October 2019 as a reaction to the results of the now published survey on current PIPAC practice (10).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Consensus guidelines for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: Technical aspects and treatment protocols

Alyami

Villeneuve

Nowacki

et al. 2022

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Consensus guidelines for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: Technical aspects and treatment protocols

Alyami

Villeneuve

Nowacki

et al. 2022

European Journal of Surgical Oncology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…We used a consensus development panel approach9 10 following the methodology described and used by the US National Institutes of Health11 and WHO 10 12. This method of consensus formation was chosen as it is most appropriate for identifying general areas of challenge and uncertainty, and formulating broad strategic plans.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital mental health: challenges and next steps

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital innovations in mental health offer great potential, but present unique challenges. Using a consensus development panel approach, an expert, international, cross-disciplinary panel met to provide a framework to conceptualise digital mental health innovations, research into mechanisms and effectiveness and approaches for clinical implementation. Key questions and outputs from the group were agreed by consensus, and are presented and discussed in the text and supported by case examples in an accompanying appendix. A number of key themes emerged. (1) Digital approaches may work best across traditional diagnostic systems: we do not have effective ontologies of mental illness and transdiagnostic/symptom-based approaches may be more fruitful. (2) Approaches in clinical implementation of digital tools/interventions need to be creative and require organisational change: not only do clinicians and patients need training and education to be more confident and skilled in using digital technologies to support shared care decision-making, but traditional roles need to be extended, with clinicians working alongside digital navigators and non-clinicians who are delivering protocolised treatments. (3) Designing appropriate studies to measure the effectiveness of implementation is also key: including digital data raises unique ethical issues, and measurement of potential harms is only just beginning. (4) Accessibility and codesign are needed to ensure innovations are long lasting. (5) Standardised guidelines for reporting would ensure effective synthesis of the evidence to inform clinical implementation. COVID-19 and the transition to virtual consultations have shown us the potential for digital innovations to improve access and quality of care in mental health: now is the ideal time to act.

show abstract

“…This will enable researchers in recognising particular competencies and behavioural indicators for modification along with the national and local setting. A global framework can be also used in the consensus development methods to develop national and local frameworks (Arakawa & Bader, 2021).…”

Section: Educational and Research Component Of The Gcfementioning

confidence: 99%

Connecting the dots in pharmacy education: The FIP International Pharmaceutical Federation Global Competency Framework for Educators and Trainers in Pharmacy (FIP-GCFE)

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The FIP (International Pharmaceutical Federation) Global Competency Framework for Educators and Trainers in Pharmacy (FIP-GCFE) is an ongoing project of the Academic Pharmacy Section of FIP in cooperation and collaboration with Sections, Special Interest Groups and Working Groups across the Federation. It was developed by a group of experts in pharmaceutical education to enable and promote the continuing professional development of pharmacists and pharmaceutical scientists who plan to advance their competence as educators and trainers in pharmacy and the pharmaceutical sciences, whether in a formal or informal context, and at all levels of education and professional development. The FIP-GCFE will be an essential resource for multiple stakeholders including individual educators, faculties of pharmacy, and accreditation agencies. This article presents the introductory text of the GCFE first version, connecting previously launched concepts and tools and explaining the integration with all other FIP workforce support frameworks, to provide a holistic approach to global workforce development.

show abstract

Consensus development methods: Considerations for national and global frameworks and policy development

Cited by 27 publications

References 45 publications

Consensus guidelines for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: Technical aspects and treatment protocols

Consensus guidelines for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: Technical aspects and treatment protocols

Digital mental health: challenges and next steps

Connecting the dots in pharmacy education: The FIP International Pharmaceutical Federation Global Competency Framework for Educators and Trainers in Pharmacy (FIP-GCFE)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About