2022
DOI: 10.1109/jas.2022.105584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus Control for Multiple Euler-Lagrange Systems Based on High-Order Disturbance Observer: An Event-Triggered Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Rkma et al, 44 the unknown disturbance is assumed to yield the Lipschitz condition, which is false|fifalse(bold-italicxfalse)prefix−fjfalse(bold-italicxfalse)false|truelijfalse‖bold-italicxiprefix−bold-italicxjfalse‖$$ \mid {f}_i\left(\boldsymbol{x}\right)-{f}_j\left(\boldsymbol{x}\right)\mid \le {\overline{l}}_{ij}\left\Vert {\boldsymbol{x}}_i-{\boldsymbol{x}}_j\right\Vert $$, where bold-italicxi$$ {\boldsymbol{x}}_i $$ and bold-italicxj$$ {\boldsymbol{x}}_j $$ are the state vector of agents i$$ i $$ and j$$ j $$ respectively. Similar to Wu et al, 32 gain δi$$ {\delta}_i $$ in the proposed control law is chosen as δi>maxfalse{ϵ1ρ1i,ϵ2ρ2ifalse}$$ {\delta}_i>\max \left\{\frac{\epsilon_1}{\rho_{1i}},\frac{\epsilon_2}{\rho_{2i}}\right\} $$, where ϵ1$$ {\epsilon}_1 $$ and ϵ2$$ {\epsilon}_2 $$ are nonnegative Lipschitz constants for nonlinearities; In Guo et al, 33 the gain k>2σfalse‖bold-italicWHfalse|f...…”
Section: Superiorities Of the Dasmcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Rkma et al, 44 the unknown disturbance is assumed to yield the Lipschitz condition, which is false|fifalse(bold-italicxfalse)prefix−fjfalse(bold-italicxfalse)false|truelijfalse‖bold-italicxiprefix−bold-italicxjfalse‖$$ \mid {f}_i\left(\boldsymbol{x}\right)-{f}_j\left(\boldsymbol{x}\right)\mid \le {\overline{l}}_{ij}\left\Vert {\boldsymbol{x}}_i-{\boldsymbol{x}}_j\right\Vert $$, where bold-italicxi$$ {\boldsymbol{x}}_i $$ and bold-italicxj$$ {\boldsymbol{x}}_j $$ are the state vector of agents i$$ i $$ and j$$ j $$ respectively. Similar to Wu et al, 32 gain δi$$ {\delta}_i $$ in the proposed control law is chosen as δi>maxfalse{ϵ1ρ1i,ϵ2ρ2ifalse}$$ {\delta}_i>\max \left\{\frac{\epsilon_1}{\rho_{1i}},\frac{\epsilon_2}{\rho_{2i}}\right\} $$, where ϵ1$$ {\epsilon}_1 $$ and ϵ2$$ {\epsilon}_2 $$ are nonnegative Lipschitz constants for nonlinearities; In Guo et al, 33 the gain k>2σfalse‖bold-italicWHfalse|f...…”
Section: Superiorities Of the Dasmcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And Wu et al 32 selected an appropriate gain based on the Lipschitz constant of nonlinear perturbations. Guo et al 33 obtained gain through communication topology structure. Unfortunately, it commonly cannot be estimated in advance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In what follows, the dynamic equation with corresponding model parameters and external disturbance for the followers are the same as those in [8]. In addition, we define the dynamic of three leaders as…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the effectiveness of the theoretical results is illustrated by the simulation examples.Among the various topics related to coordination control [1-3], containment control for multi-agent systems has received much attention from systems and control communities. Compared with tracking control, which only has one leader (see [4][5][6][7][8][9]), a distinct feature of containment control…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%