The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2913546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus Constructing in Large-Scale Group Decision Making With Multi-Granular Probabilistic 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations

Abstract: As the number of participants involves in decisions getting complex and the heterogeneity could be produced among decision makers, a large-scale group decision making (LGDM) method with consensus constructing need to be considered. In order to demonstrate the complex relationship and reduce heterogeneity among decision makers, a consensus process of LGDM is proposed in this paper, in which multi-granular probabilistic fuzzy linguistic preference relations (MGPFLPRs) are used to represent subgroup's preferences… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I N GROUP decision making (GDM), a group of decision makers (DMs) works together to analyze problems, evaluate alternatives, and choose an agreed solution from a collection of alternatives [1]- [7]. Large-scale GDM (LSGDM) is a special type of GDM problem, in which a large number of DMs participate in the decision-making process [8]- [13]. Usually, when the number of DMs exceeds 11, the GDM process is considered as an LSGDM [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I N GROUP decision making (GDM), a group of decision makers (DMs) works together to analyze problems, evaluate alternatives, and choose an agreed solution from a collection of alternatives [1]- [7]. Large-scale GDM (LSGDM) is a special type of GDM problem, in which a large number of DMs participate in the decision-making process [8]- [13]. Usually, when the number of DMs exceeds 11, the GDM process is considered as an LSGDM [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Compared with the related CRP method [28] Song and Li [28] proposed an automatic iteration-based CRP method with MG-PLPRs. Then the CRP method is applied to the above case and the ranking of alternatives is derived as…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most relevant literature in this study is the CRP studies in LSGDM based on multi-granularity linguistic information. Song and Li [28] constructed a automatic iteration CRP with MG-PLPRs. Liu et al [29] proposed a two-stage CRP in LSGDM with MG-PLPRs, including both within-cluster and across-cluster CRP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are a few research studies that focused on EDM on the situation of the large group in recent years. Song and Li [34] proposed a consensus process of the large group EDM by using multigranular probabilistic fuzzy linguistic preference relations (MGPFLPRs) to represent subgroup's preferences information. Xu et al [35] presented a framework for the LGEDM problem in a linguistic environment by considering decision makers' risk appetites.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%