2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.02970
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus-based Optimization and Ensemble Kalman Inversion for Global Optimization Problems with Constraints

Abstract: We introduce a practical method for incorporating equality and inequality constraints in global optimization methods based on stochastic interacting particle systems, specifically consensusbased optimization (CBO) and ensemble Kalman inversion (EKI). Unlike other approaches in the literature, the method we propose does not constrain the dynamics to the feasible region of the state space at all times; the particles evolve in the full space, but are attracted towards the feasible set by means of a penalization t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first two tests, we compare the proposed Kalman inversion methods (EKI, UKI, EAKI, ETKI applied to Eqs. ( 14), ( 15) and ( 18) with other recently proposed Gaussian approximation algorithms, including the ensemble Kalman sampler (EKS) [75,77] + , and the consensus-based sampler (CBS) [103,51,104,105,52] * . We also compare with variants of iterative Kalman filter methods, which seek to deform the prior into the posterior in one time unit (transport/coupling) using a finite number of intermediate steps (see Appendix B) based on (12).…”
Section: Overview Of Test Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first two tests, we compare the proposed Kalman inversion methods (EKI, UKI, EAKI, ETKI applied to Eqs. ( 14), ( 15) and ( 18) with other recently proposed Gaussian approximation algorithms, including the ensemble Kalman sampler (EKS) [75,77] + , and the consensus-based sampler (CBS) [103,51,104,105,52] * . We also compare with variants of iterative Kalman filter methods, which seek to deform the prior into the posterior in one time unit (transport/coupling) using a finite number of intermediate steps (see Appendix B) based on (12).…”
Section: Overview Of Test Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first two tests, we compare the proposed Kalman inversion methods (EKI, UKI, EAKI, ETKI applied to equations ( 14), ( 15) and ( 18) with other recently proposed Gaussian approximation algorithms, including the ensemble Kalman sampler (EKS) [75,77], 9 and the consensus-based sampler (CBS) [52,53,[103][104][105]. 10 We also compare with variants of iterative Kalman filter methods, which seek to deform the prior into the posterior in one time unit (transport/coupling) using a finite number of intermediate steps (see appendix B) based on (12).…”
Section: Overview Of Test Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we do not require any additional smoothing or any special treatment of the non-differentiability, since CBO does not rely on explicit gradient information. At the same time as finalizing this manuscript, we learned that the case of smooth penalization in the CBO context has been discussed in [12]. In their approach however the penalty parameter needs to tend to infinity and contrary to our work no explicit update rule of the parameter is given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%