2009
DOI: 10.1080/13621020902731132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus and division in Australian citizenship education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to David Kemp, the education minister in the Australian Government at the time, the emphasis on developing active citizenship skills to participate in current civics issues was lessened in order that greater emphasis be placed on knowledge of the historical development of Australian democracy. (Kemp, 1997, in Macintyre andSimpson, 2009). Kennedy (1997), criticised Discovering Democracy because the programme had failed to identify the things that matter to young people, the things that can help them understand their reality and give them a stake in the future that rightly belongs to them.…”
Section: Minimalist Approaches In Australia To Citizenship Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to David Kemp, the education minister in the Australian Government at the time, the emphasis on developing active citizenship skills to participate in current civics issues was lessened in order that greater emphasis be placed on knowledge of the historical development of Australian democracy. (Kemp, 1997, in Macintyre andSimpson, 2009). Kennedy (1997), criticised Discovering Democracy because the programme had failed to identify the things that matter to young people, the things that can help them understand their reality and give them a stake in the future that rightly belongs to them.…”
Section: Minimalist Approaches In Australia To Citizenship Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, responsibility has become privatised (Ilcan, 2009) or ‘individualised’ (Miller and Rose, 2008: 91) so that schools are seen as sites in which students should be learning how to be responsible for their own conduct and learning. This emphasis on responsibility for individual choices and success has resulted in ‘… a disquiet that traditional community values and cohesion [a]re breaking down’ (Macintyre and Simpson, 2009: 123). The rationale is that individual freedom, if left un-checked, could potentially threaten the interests of the ‘common good’.…”
Section: Responsibility In the Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los estudios comparativos que han analizado los currículos de formación ciudadana en distintos países (Cox, 2006(Cox, , 2010Cox, Lira & Gazmuri, 2009;Davies & Issit, 2005;Kerr, 2002;Osler & Starkey, 2001;Suárez, 2008) han identificado que, tanto en el mundo anglosajón como en América Latina, los programas curriculares de formación ciudadana buscan desarrollar una ciudadanía activa, con énfasis en el respeto al otro y a la diversidad, pero sin que esto implique renunciar al objetivo de lograr la homogenización identitaria de los ciudadanos e inculcar formas de participación únicas, con alusión indirecta o superficial al multiculturalismo. Así mismo, las investigaciones centradas en la implementación de los currículos ciudadanos evidencian falencias importantes por la falta de coherencia entre los objetivos del currículo, sus contenidos y las prácticas pedagógicas propuestas para su implementación (Macintyre & Simpson, 2009;Westheimer & Kahne, 2004).…”
Section: El Efecto De La Escuela En La Formación Ciudadanaunclassified