2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45249-9_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conscious and Unconscious Counting on Anonymous Dynamic Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For dynamic anonymous networks, consensus based size estimation methods have been proposed in [6]- [8]. Another size estimation technique has been investigated by Evans et al [9] for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For dynamic anonymous networks, consensus based size estimation methods have been proposed in [6]- [8]. Another size estimation technique has been investigated by Evans et al [9] for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, the protocol in [12] computes only an upper bound on the network size that may be as bad as exponential. The protocols in [5] compute the exact count, but one guarantees only double-exponential running time and the other, called unconscious, does not terminate. Another protocol [6] is shown to have eventual termination, but without running-time guarantees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the practical side, in [7] the unconscious protocol [5] is augmented with a termination heuristic that allows the leader to decide when to stop. They show experimentally that the algorithm converges to a decision in a number of rounds that is linear in the size of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, size estimation algorithm for two networks [4], distributed network size estimation and distributed statistical estimation [5]- [8], circled random walk and the tokened random walk [9] have been investigated. Howlader et al proposed an ALOHA based node estimation technique [10]- [12] counting capture effect and long delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%