Consanguinity and reproductive wastage in the Palestinian Territories

Abstract

Many studies have found that consanguinity poses a threat to child mortality and health and can also pose a threat to offspring survival before birth. However, there are conflicting findings with some studies having found no increased risk on offspring survival associated with consanguinity. Data from a population-based survey conducted in 2004 in the Palestinian Territories was used to assess the risk of consanguinity on offspring survival. The analysis was conducted on 4418 women aged 15-49 who were asked whether or not they had experienced a stillbirth or a spontaneous abortion. These two outcomes were combined together for the analysis of reproductive wastage. Multivariable negative binomial regression was conducted to calculate the incidence risk ratios (IRR) for each region in the Palestinian Territories separately. The strongest risk factors for reproductive wastage, after controlling for other variables, were found to be consanguinity, age and parity with age presenting the highest IRRs. Standard of living, locality type, education level, women's employment and past intrauterine device use were not found to be significant risk factors for reproductive wastage. In the West Bank only first cousin level of consanguinity was found to be significant and 'hamola' level (or from same family clan) lost its significance after adjusting for other variables. In the Gaza Strip both the first cousin and 'hamola' levels of consanguinity were significant and presented almost equal IRRs of 1.3. In conclusion, consanguinity was found to be a significant risk factor for reproductive wastage.

Predictors of stillbirths in Bangladesh: evidence from the 2004–2014 nation-wide household surveys

“…Consistent with previous studies conducted in developing countries, from rural Bangladesh to Uganda [10,11,33,34], this study showed that stillbirth rates were higher among mothers with no formal education compared to educated mothers. A study conducted in Norway indicated that stillbirth rates were higher in Norwegian women with fewer years of education, but not among Pakistani immigrant women in Norway [24].…”

Effects of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behaviour, adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring mortality in Oman

“…However, the results are divergent. Many studies have demonstrated that consanguineous marriages are associated with higher risk of autosomal recessive diseases and congenital malformations, mental retardation, higher pre-reproductive deaths, low birth weight and higher postnatal mortality among offspring (Khoury et al 1987;Khlat 1988;Bittles and Neel 1994;Bundey and Alam 1995;Stoltenberg et al 1999;Mokhtar and Abdel-Fattah 2001;Bener and Hussain 2006;Saadat 2007;Assaf et al 2008), whilst others fail to discover any association (Rao and Inbaraj 1977;Devi et al 1981;Reddy 1983;Al-Awadi et al 1986;Mumtaz et al 2007;Bittles and Black 2010;Gowri et al 2011).…”

Have neonatal mortality rates in the state of Qatar become static? A PEARL study analysis

“…The incidence of consanguinity in Qatar is 54% [14]. Consanguinity has a known association with preterm births [15], as well as with perinatal wastage [16]. In our study, 35% of babies with congenital anomalies had declared futility on antenatal ultrasound scan.…”