1993
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.1993.11907742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consanguinity and Inbreeding Effects on Fertility and Mortality Among Malas of Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research findings regarding the effects of consanguineous marriage on fertility are also mixed, with some studies showing reduced fertility among the couples with consanguineous marriages (Reid 1976;Ansari and Sinha 1978), while others report significantly higher levels of fertility among consanguineous couples (Schull et al 1970;Philippe 1974;Reddy and Rao 1978;Rao and Inbaraj 1979;Bittles et al 1991Bittles et al , 2002; while no significant pattern is observed in many instances (Tanner 1958;Devi et al 1981;Reddy 1983;Hann 1985;Al-Awadi et al 1986). The inconsistency in the results of the above-mentioned studies may be attributed to methodological flaws, namely small sample size and poor allowance for potential confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research findings regarding the effects of consanguineous marriage on fertility are also mixed, with some studies showing reduced fertility among the couples with consanguineous marriages (Reid 1976;Ansari and Sinha 1978), while others report significantly higher levels of fertility among consanguineous couples (Schull et al 1970;Philippe 1974;Reddy and Rao 1978;Rao and Inbaraj 1979;Bittles et al 1991Bittles et al , 2002; while no significant pattern is observed in many instances (Tanner 1958;Devi et al 1981;Reddy 1983;Hann 1985;Al-Awadi et al 1986). The inconsistency in the results of the above-mentioned studies may be attributed to methodological flaws, namely small sample size and poor allowance for potential confounders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the results are divergent. Many studies have demonstrated that consanguineous marriages are associated with higher risk of autosomal recessive diseases and congenital malformations, mental retardation, higher pre-reproductive deaths, low birth weight and higher postnatal mortality among offspring (Khoury et al 1987;Khlat 1988;Bittles and Neel 1994;Bundey and Alam 1995;Stoltenberg et al 1999;Mokhtar and Abdel-Fattah 2001;Bener and Hussain 2006;Saadat 2007;Assaf et al 2008), whilst others fail to discover any association (Rao and Inbaraj 1977;Devi et al 1981;Reddy 1983;Al-Awadi et al 1986;Mumtaz et al 2007;Bittles and Black 2010;Gowri et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In other words, some diseases may appear as a result of an increase in the frequency of homozygotes with regard to certain rare recessive alleles. 1 Of the many studies that have been conducted in Arabic and Middle Eastern societies, some have focused on the relationship between consanguinity and fertility and mortality (Bittles et al 1993;Reddy 1983;Tuncbilek 2001;Tuncbilek and Koc 1994;Yasim et al 1997), while others have concentrated on the effect of consanguineous mating on anthropometric measurements of infants and newborns (Basaran et al 1994;Khlat 1989;Saedi-Wong and Al-Frayh 1989). Hearing loss and blindness are other concerns of research (Elder and De Cock 1993;Zakzouk et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Saedi-Wong, Al-Frayh and Wong (1989) find that, in Saudi Arabia there are higher rates of marriage to a close relative in rural areas and among the poor. In addition, among the Reddis of Chittoor District in South India, Rami and Reddy (1979) show that marriage to a close family member is higher among landowning families. 5…”
Section: Why Marry a Relative?mentioning
confidence: 99%