2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2018.8619814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity of Wireless Sensor Networks Secured by the Heterogeneous Random Pairwise Key Predistribution Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paper considers any of b n = o ln n n , b n = Θ ln n n , and b n = ω ln n n , while [1] evaluates only b n = Θ ln n n Improvements over Eletreby and Yagan [2], [22]. Although a recent research by Eletreby and Yagan [2] uses the fine-grained scaling discussed above for a more complex graph model (another work [22] by them uses the weaker scaling), both studies [2], [22] (just like [1]) also demand K m,n /K 1,n = o(ln n), which is less general than K m,n /K 1,n = o( √ n) addressed in this paper. Improvements over Zhao et al [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our paper considers any of b n = o ln n n , b n = Θ ln n n , and b n = ω ln n n , while [1] evaluates only b n = Θ ln n n Improvements over Eletreby and Yagan [2], [22]. Although a recent research by Eletreby and Yagan [2] uses the fine-grained scaling discussed above for a more complex graph model (another work [22] by them uses the weaker scaling), both studies [2], [22] (just like [1]) also demand K m,n /K 1,n = o(ln n), which is less general than K m,n /K 1,n = o( √ n) addressed in this paper. Improvements over Zhao et al [3].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the seminal work [1] of Yagan (and its conference version [29]) on connectivity, our work has the following improvements, as already discussed in Section I-C above (we do not repeat the details here): more practical conditions by considering K m,n /K 1,n = o( √ n ) instead of just K m,n /K 1,n = o(ln n), more fine-grained zero-one law by considering the scaling ln n+βn n rather than c ln n n for a constant c = 1, and more general scaling condition. Although a recent work by Eletreby and Yagan [2] uses the finegrained scaling discussed above for a more complex graph model (other researches [22], [30] by them uses the weaker scaling), all these studies [2], [22], [30] (just like [1]) still demand K m,n /K 1,n = o(ln n), which is less general than K m,n /K 1,n = o( √ n) addressed in this paper. In addition,…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After deployment, two sensor nodes can communicate securely if they have at least one pairwise key in common. In Section II, we give the precise implementation details of this scheme and its heterogeneous variant proposed in [8]. The pairwise key predistribution scheme preserves the secrecy of rest of the network in case of node capture attacks, and also enables node-to-node authentication and quorum-based revocation [7].…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a theoretical stand point, this corresponds to advancing the literature pertaining to connectivity in inhomogeneous variants of classical random graph models. In order to model differing node capabilities, [8] introduced a heterogeneous pairwise key predistribution scheme in which each node is classified as type-1 (respectively, type-2) with probability µ (respectively, 1 − µ), 0 < µ < 1. Then, each type-1 (respectively, type-2) node selects one node (respectively, K n nodes) uniformly at random from all other nodes; see Figure 1.…”
Section: A Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%