2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity, neutral theories and the assessment of species vulnerability to global change in temperate estuaries

Abstract: One of the main adaptation strategies to global change scenarios, aiming to preserve ecosystem functioning and biodiversity, is to maximise ecosystem resilience. The resilience of a species metapopulation can be improved by facilitating connectivity between local populations, which will prevent demographic stochasticity and inbreeding. The objective of this investigation is to estimate the degree of connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The creation and analysis of large data set on population genetics in species groups with different dispersal abilities linked genetic variation to constraints in movement within benthic habitats in macroinvertebrates. This finding appears consistent with a "neutral theory" explanation for marine biodiversity spatial patterns (Chust et al, 2013.…”
Section: Habitats and Functionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The creation and analysis of large data set on population genetics in species groups with different dispersal abilities linked genetic variation to constraints in movement within benthic habitats in macroinvertebrates. This finding appears consistent with a "neutral theory" explanation for marine biodiversity spatial patterns (Chust et al, 2013.…”
Section: Habitats and Functionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Hovel, 2003;Leibold et al, 2004;Boström et al, 2006). A faunal community living in such patchily distributed habitat has been given to the set of local communities linked by the dispersal of multiple potentially interacting species, that is, the metacommunity (e.g., Hubbell, 2001;Holyoak et al, 2005;Logue et al, 2011;Martiny et al, 2011;Chust et al, 2013a,b. The relative importance of environmental and spatial processes in determining community structures has been evaluated in various local community forms patches in both terrestrial and coastal landscapes, such as ponds, lakes, streams, estuaries, marine pelagic areas, tide pools, and intertidal rocky shores (Cottenie, 2005;Mykrä et al, 2007;Lindo and Winchester, 2009;Pandit et al, 2009;Pinto and MacDougall, 2010;Fiorentino et al, 2012;Chust et al, 2013a). In these studies, the relative contributions of environmental and spatial processes were evaluated in each taxonomic group (e.g., phytoplankton, zooplankton, macro-algae, molluscs), because the relative importance of these two mechanisms varied depending on community characteristics such as ecological traits (e.g., dispersal ability, habitat type, life history, and trophic level).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, mtDNA data have been widely used to assess the temporal and spatial fluctuations of haplotype diversity in natural populations. Many studies investigate cryptic species along environmental gradients (e.g., Jolly et al, 2005;Barroso et al, 2010), but few focus on the population structure within a specified area (e.g., Schulze et al, 2000;Craft et al, 2010;Chust et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%