2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2008
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2008.4541143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity-based parcellation of the cortical surface using q-ball imaging

Abstract: This work exploits the idea that each individual brain region has a specific connection profile to create parcellations of the cortical surface using MR diffusion imaging. The parcellation is performed in two steps. First, for each vertex of a cortical surface mesh, a connection profile is computed using a probabilistic tractography framework. The tractography is performed from q-ball fields using regularized particle trajectories. The raw connectivity matrix is smoothed over the surface to account for a reaso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the methods have to deal with the high inter-subject variability, especially in the brain cortex and superficial white matter (SWM). Therefore, to reduce the complexity of the problem, some methods are focused or have been tested on a few brain regions, or have used an anatomical parcellation for initial regions (Anwander et al, 2006 ; Klein et al, 2007 ; Guevara et al, 2008 ; Perrin et al, 2008 ; Roca et al, 2010 ; Li et al, 2017 ). In general, the similarity between the connectivity profiles of the voxels (or vertices) is estimated using some similarity measure and then, a method is applied to regroup elements with common connectivity patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the methods have to deal with the high inter-subject variability, especially in the brain cortex and superficial white matter (SWM). Therefore, to reduce the complexity of the problem, some methods are focused or have been tested on a few brain regions, or have used an anatomical parcellation for initial regions (Anwander et al, 2006 ; Klein et al, 2007 ; Guevara et al, 2008 ; Perrin et al, 2008 ; Roca et al, 2010 ; Li et al, 2017 ). In general, the similarity between the connectivity profiles of the voxels (or vertices) is estimated using some similarity measure and then, a method is applied to regroup elements with common connectivity patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome some of the limitations, a key idea is to collapse the connectivity profiles using a set of Regions Of Interest: connectivity weights are summed up across each ROI. Some approaches use a priori anatomical information such as lobar or gyri cortex segmentation [4,5] or regions of interest from invasive tracing primate studies [6]. When there is a correspondence across subjects between these segmentations, it provides a direct way to perform the clustering at the level of the group of subjects [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches use a priori anatomical information such as lobar or gyri cortex segmentation [4,5] or regions of interest from invasive tracing primate studies [6]. When there is a correspondence across subjects between these segmentations, it provides a direct way to perform the clustering at the level of the group of subjects [4,5]. The robustness is largely increased because the clustering is focusing on profiles reproducible across subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one is based on a segmentation of the brain to collapse the connectivity profiles: all the tracts reaching the same segment are summed up. This segmentation can be anatomical, for instance based on lobes or gyri [8,9,10], but the same idea could be applied with fMRI-based activation maps. In the papers cited above, the segmentation used for collapsing was based on individual data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%