1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19981114)70:7<1273::aid-app4>3.0.co;2-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity and spacing effects in hydrogen-bonding polymer solutions and blends

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In recent experimental work, it was found that the number of hydrogen bonds in polymer mixtures is strongly influenced by chain-connectivity effects and the spacing of functional groups along the chain. In this article, the relationships between the equilibrium constants used to describe the number of hydrogen bonds in mixtures of various types (blends, solutions, random copolymers, etc.) is elucidated and described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also included in each of the plots in Figure are predictions of the effective T g of the PACM component (black lines) and the Jeffamine component (green lines) using the Lodge‐McLeish model . The Lodge‐McLeish model, and similar work by Painter and Coleman examines the effects of concentration fluctuations or local dynamic heterogeneity which are a result of chain connectivity. The model uses a modified Fox‐Flory equation, with ϕ being the volume fraction of component A or B: 1Tgtrue(ϕtrue)= ϕeffectiveTg,A+1ϕeffectiveTg,B …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also included in each of the plots in Figure are predictions of the effective T g of the PACM component (black lines) and the Jeffamine component (green lines) using the Lodge‐McLeish model . The Lodge‐McLeish model, and similar work by Painter and Coleman examines the effects of concentration fluctuations or local dynamic heterogeneity which are a result of chain connectivity. The model uses a modified Fox‐Flory equation, with ϕ being the volume fraction of component A or B: 1Tgtrue(ϕtrue)= ϕeffectiveTg,A+1ϕeffectiveTg,B …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may at first be expected that the concentrations of relaxing species in blends with strong intermolecular interactions are unimodal and distributed rather narrowly around the mean composition. However, the number of hydrogen bonds is strongly affected by chain connectivity and the spacing of functional groups, which effectively reduces the intermolecular hydrogen bonding contribution to the free energy of mixing . The local SHS self-concentration can be enhanced further by intramolecular hydrogen bonding between −OH groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was useful to investigate the specific intra‐ or intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonding16, 17 or electron donor–acceptor complexes with FTIR. Interactions between styrenic polymers and methacrylic polymers are weak and nonspecific.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%