Connections of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) structural members:

Duthinh, Dat

doi:10.6028/nist.ir.6532

Cited by 16 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The typical design implications and disadvantages related to adhesive bonding, which must be taken into consideration and resolved, are [13]: Bolted connections offer multiple advantages, such as: disassembly ability, simple surface preparation, easy predictability of joint failure, simple inspection, easy handling and machining, and short assembly and joining times. However, these advantages come at the expense of several disadvantages: Hybrid bonding-and-bolting solutions can improve the joint stiffness, but do not necessarily increase its mechanical performance [14].…”

Section: State Of the Art In Gfrp Connections For Structural Profilesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Friction Riveting (FricRiveting) as a new joining technique in GFRP lightweight bridge construction

Blaga

Santos

Băncilă

et al. 2015

Construction and Building Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: State Of the Art In Gfrp Connections For Structural Profilesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Friction Riveting (FricRiveting) as a new joining technique in GFRP lightweight bridge construction

Blaga

Santos

Băncilă

et al. 2015

Construction and Building Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…While the resistance of friction-riveted joints is based mainly on the mechanical interaction between the composite material and the anchored metallic rivet, FricRiveting differentiates from classical mechanical fastening techniques by the fact that it does not involve through-holes and has a thin layer of consolidated polymer sealing the joint, reducing thus stress concentrations. This process characteristic is very convenient considering that mechanically fastened GFRP joints usually exhibit high susceptibility to stress concentrations due to their brittle nature [12,13]. Further information on the advantages and problems regarding mechanical fastening are presented in [14].…”

Section: Fricriveting Of Pei-gf / Ti Gr2mentioning

confidence: 99%

Friction Riveting of glass–fibre-reinforced polyetherimide composite and titanium grade 2 hybrid joints

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, the feasibility of Friction Riveting on thermoplastic composite laminates with metals was investigated on glass-fibre-reinforced polyetherimide with titanium grade 2. Microscopy analysis (light optical and laser scanning confocal microscopy), temperature monitoring (infrared thermometry) and quasi-static mechanical testing (T-pull tensile testing) were used to investigate joint properties. Joints with reduced amounts of thermo-mechanically modified composite material with moderate to high tensile strengths (1.9 to 4.0 kN) were achieved. The average process temperatures (430 to 464 °C) of the molten matrix were below the range inducing the extensive thermal degradation of the polyetherimide matrix and out of the range inducing the plasticising of titanium grade 2. The Volumetric Ratio, a simplified analytical model describing the anchoring efficiency of the rivet, was demonstrated to be directly proportional to the tensile strength of the joint and therefore an adequate analytical model to describe the mechanical performance of joints. Finally, a correlation between the rotational speed, heat input, process temperature and rivet plasticising was observed. The higher the rotational speed was, the higher the heat input, temperature and deformation of the plasticised rivet tip became, leading to higher rivet anchoring performances.

show abstract

“…They are designed to provide a major strength and stiffness to the structural joint for the life of the structure, -Secondary structural connections, which provide some strength and stiffness to the joint, but their failure would not cause damage beyond the structural elements they join. An example is the field connection of two modular units and -Non-structural connections, e.g., joints of decorative panels [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical characteristics of joints between glass fiber reinforced composite tubes and steel cylinder obtained by different fastening elements

Radulović¹,

Citakovic²

2016

Sci Tech Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, investigation of tensile testing for specific assemblies of two elements, jointed by mechanical fasteners, are presented. One element is a specific small diameter tube. This element is produced by filament winding technology using glass fiber impregnated with polyester resin. Another element is cylindrical steel part, obtained by standard technology. Basic data about composite materials and mechanical fastening are presented. Pins and rings were used as mechanical fasteners. Data of tubes preparation and assembling glass fiber/polyester resin tubes and cylinder with pins and rings are presented. The assemblies specific composite material parts/metallic parts jointed by fasteners were exposed to the action of axial tensile stress. A tensile breaking force of the assemblies was determined and the influence of pins number to tensile breaking force was presented. A failure mechanism of specific composite tubes fastened with pins and rings is described

show abstract

Connections of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) structural members:

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Friction Riveting (FricRiveting) as a new joining technique in GFRP lightweight bridge construction

Friction Riveting (FricRiveting) as a new joining technique in GFRP lightweight bridge construction

Friction Riveting of glass–fibre-reinforced polyetherimide composite and titanium grade 2 hybrid joints

Mechanical characteristics of joints between glass fiber reinforced composite tubes and steel cylinder obtained by different fastening elements

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About