Connections between Asian and European World Cities: Measurement, Analysis, and Evaluation

Abstract

Although world regions continue to be a key feature of the geographical imagination, there has been relatively little innovative research on world regionalization through the lens of city connections. Against the backdrop of an increasingly urban and interconnected world, in this paper, we evaluate the connections between European and Asian world cities. Based on a model conjecturing intercity connections through office locations of globalized producer services firms, we analyze the networks of both regions’ major cities. To this end, we establish frameworks that allow (1) comparison of the level of connectivity of cities and (2) analysis of the strength and orientation of the interactions between cities. We find that both Europe and Asia have a larger number of well-connected cities than any other world region. Both regions are roughly comparable in terms of the distribution of their urban connectivities, but there are some notable differences (e.g., Asia’s system being more top-heavy) and evolutions (e.g., Asian cities gaining more connectivity over the last decade). There are also two geographical dimensions to the interpretations of these patterns of urban connectivity: (1) the variegated importance of state-spaces (e.g., national gateways) and (2) the uneven regional focus of intercity connections (e.g., Luxembourg and Singapore being less dependent on regional connections). We use our findings to argue that the time is ripe for a more nuanced and contextualized answer to the question of how cities (can) act politically on the global scale in general and Asia–Europe relations in particular.

Research on the Geographical Pattern, Evolution Model, and Driving Mechanism of Carbon Emission Density from Urban Industrial Land in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China

“…It is worth to note that close cooperation between different cities in the YREB has been established, and as a world-class urban agglomeration, the YREB is closely linked to other cities around the world [74]. And the analysis above shows that the carbon emission density of industrial land in the YREB shows significant spatial heterogeneity and autocorrelation.…”

Has China’s New Infrastructure Promoted Sustainable Economic Development? Evidence Based on Information Infrastructure and Entrepreneurship

“…In recent years, economic connections between Chinese cities and other cities around the world have been increasingly strengthened (Derudder et al, 2022) [1], and the economic strength of enterprises has also improved (Raźniak et al, 2021) [2]. Chinese cities have shown enormous economic potential on a global scale (Raźniak et al, 2017) [3].…”

The Impact of High-Quality Energy Development and Technological Innovation on the Real Economy of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China: A Spatial Economic and Threshold Effect Analysis

“…Many cities are embedded in elongated multi-city corridors and wider sub-national regions. Chinese cities have been raising their economic intercity connectivity both at sub-national and cross-border levels, and the increasingly closer connections between Chinese cities and other world cities imply the importance of the development of China's regional real economy [2,3]. Large corporations are further extending their economic power beyond their geographic location to shift the geographic pattern of cities [4].…”