2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connection system for gridshell structures using parametric modeling and digital fabrication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea was that it could be customizable for the structure shape and tubular bars. The connection was divided into 2 parts: first, the global definition of the contact surfaces, supports, and fitting angles; and second, the definition of the geometry of the parts (Oliveira et al 2020).…”
Section: Bioresourcescommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea was that it could be customizable for the structure shape and tubular bars. The connection was divided into 2 parts: first, the global definition of the contact surfaces, supports, and fitting angles; and second, the definition of the geometry of the parts (Oliveira et al 2020).…”
Section: Bioresourcescommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to these two common approaches, the main focus of this paper is to develop nodes as visible objects. Research that develops nodes as visible objects also exists, and this research often focuses on possibilities with manufacturing with 3D printing; see de Oliviera et al, 24 Crolla et al 25 and Seifi et al 12 Other examples ivestigate an assembly of 3-axis machined plate, like in Lienhard et al 26 Apart from these recent examples, most development of gridshell nodes as visible objects happens in the industry, like from Lanik Structures 27 and Mero Structures, 28 as formerly pointed out by the author. 1 This study proposes a set of node principles for timber gridshells with aluminium nodes.…”
Section: Developing Nodes As Visible Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shortcoming of building based on preestablished universal kits of parts is the limited design freedom. Attempts to mitigate this issue have produced "universal joints" (Rochas, 2014) or adaptive parts (de Oliveira, Pauletti and Meneghetti, 2020) that trade between structural stiffness, reusability and design freedom (applicability) often with mixed results. Other approaches have looked to probe the limits of kit design by building dedicated computational construction frameworks for dedicated toy construction kits like the ZomeTool (Zimmer et al, 2014) or have produced computational strategies (Brütting, Senatore and Fivet, 2021) to construct a kit of spherical nodes and bars able to accommodate the construction of several reticular structures with distinct geometries and topologies, thus sharing one single set of resources among multiple constructions that are chronologically distinct.…”
Section: Design For Reusementioning
confidence: 99%