2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40471-016-0065-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting the Dots in Childhood Obesity Disparities: a Review of Growth Patterns from Birth to Pre-Adolescence

Abstract: In this review, we considered how disparities in obesity emerge between birth, when socially disadvantaged infants tend to be small, and later in childhood, when socially disadvantaged groups have high risk of obesity. We reviewed epidemiologic evidence of socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in growth from infancy to pre-adolescence. Minority race/ethnicity and lower socioeconomic status was associated with rapid weight gain in infancy but not in older age groups, and social differences in linear growt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(212 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first results are consistent with studies conducted on young children [ 65 ], as well as with studies on elementary school children [ 66 , 67 ] suggesting the relative stability of weight status growth during infancy and childhood. However, it is important to note that there are several factors driving differences in growth trajectories [ 68 ], such as the effect of genetic variants [ 69 ], and early life contextual factors [ 8 ]. Moreover, the number of data points, analytic methods, sample characteristics, and other factors also account for differences among studies in growth trajectories [ 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our first results are consistent with studies conducted on young children [ 65 ], as well as with studies on elementary school children [ 66 , 67 ] suggesting the relative stability of weight status growth during infancy and childhood. However, it is important to note that there are several factors driving differences in growth trajectories [ 68 ], such as the effect of genetic variants [ 69 ], and early life contextual factors [ 8 ]. Moreover, the number of data points, analytic methods, sample characteristics, and other factors also account for differences among studies in growth trajectories [ 66 , 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are population groups associated with the highest prevalence of RIWG (40), and attrition in high-risk groups contributes to existing uncertainties about how RIWG interventions actually work for groups with the greatest need for these initiatives. Low risk perception, lack of subject prioritisation, lack of time and resources needed to commit to interventions, and high expectations of negative experiences of participating have been suggested as reasons why there is low interest in intervention involvement in these groups (36).…”
Section: Intervention Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher maternal acculturation also predicted a higher weight‐to‐length z ‐score at 6 weeks, and a steeper slope of weight gain across the first year, mediated by formula‐feeding. Although socially disadvantaged and low‐income infants are at risk of low birth weight, they also have elevated risk of child obesity, a seemingly inconsistent pattern that may be explained by accelerated growth in early infancy . Birth weight did not predict the slope of infant weight‐to‐length z ‐score across the first year, but higher birth weight predicted higher weight at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%