Connecting Social Provisioning and Functional Finance in a Post-Keynesian Institutional Analysis of the Public Sector

Abstract

This paper establishes connections between the frameworks of social provisioning and functional finance, and discusses a post-Keynesian-Institutionalist theory of the public sector that emerges out of these linkages. The concept of social provisioning has emerged out of Institutional economics, and has been further developed by institutional and other heterodox economists. Its potential as a methodological foundation that connects various heterodox approaches has received some growing attention. Such discussions have not referred in an analytical manner to functional finance. On the other hand, the principles of functional finance have been elaborated and developed outside an explicit grounding in a social provisioning framework. The article specifies further the concept of social provisioning and discusses functional finance within such a framework. The framework of functional finance gains a structural and institutional grounding which enables a deeper and more critical conceptualization of the public sector.

Es el momento de la política fiscal: repensar los estabilizadores automáticos contra la pandemia

“…Esto se consigue alterando la asignación de recursos reales que los efectos perniciosos de la marca del desempleo imponen al conjunto de la sociedad por causa del deterioro de la salud mental y física de los trabajadores parados, evitando en las comunidades de mayor prevalencia de desempleo a largo plazo la propagación de la delincuencia, las drogas, la ludopatía o el alcoholismo, y la desestructuración de las familias que determinan el desarrollo de los más jóvenes (Tcherneva, 2019). En su lugar, podemos movilizar y dirigir recursos hacia la lucha contra el cambio climático (Forstater, 2003); la consecución efectiva de la igualdad de género a través de la visibilización y socialización de los cuidados (Todorova, 2013); y en un momento como este, luchar contra la pandemia del COVID-19 en su triple dimensión: sanitaria, económica y social. Si consideramos todos los costes mencionados podemos decir, como muestran Nersisyan y Wray (2019) en su trabajo de cómo pagar el Green New Deal, que los programas de garantía de empleo se pagarán solos.…”

The embedded state and social provisioning: insights from Norbert Elias

“…The outcome of all these crossings, borrowings, and combinations (or "cross-approach engagement") is a pluralistic integrative research program, which is "now an established feature on the disciplinary landscape and the progressive future of economics" (Lee 2008). Lee himself has played an important role to make the heterodox community more aware of itself (Jo 2013) and his global argument has been resumed and expanded notably by Jo (2011) and Todorova (2013). Elias is among those forgotten precursors of the heterodox approach in economics as described by Lee, which will be one day or another fully acknowledged as such.…”