Connecting planets around horizontal branch stars with known exoplanets

Abstract

We study the distribution of exoplanets around main sequence (MS) stars and apply our results to the binary model for the formation of extreme horizontal branch (EHB; sdO; sdB; hot subdwarfs) stars. By Binary model we refer both to stellar and substellar companions that enhance the mass loss rate, where substellar companions stand for both massive planets and brown dwarfs. We conclude that sdB (EHB) stars are prime targets for planet searches. We reach this conclusion by noticing that the bimodal distribution of planets around stars with respect to the parameter M_p*a^2, is most prominent for stars in the mass range 1Mo < M < 1.5Mo; 'a' is the orbital separation, 'M' is the stellar mass and 'M_p' the planet mass. This is also the mass range of the progenitors of EHB stars that are formed through the interaction of their progenitors with planets (assuming the EHB formation mechanism is the binary model). In the binary model for the formation of EHB stars interaction with a binary companion or a substellar object (a planet or a brown dwarf), causes the progenitor to lose most of its envelope mass during its red giant branch (RGB) phase. As a result of that the descendant HB star is hot, i.e., an EHB (sdB) star. The bimodal distribution suggests that even if the close-in planet that formed the EHB star did not survive its RGB common envelope evolution, one planet or more might survive at a>1AU. Also, if a planet or more are observed at a>1AU, it is possible that a closer massive planet did survive the common envelope phase, and it is orbiting the EHB with an orbital period of hours to days.Comment: MNRAS, in pres

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? BLAZHKO AND NON-BLAZHKO RRab STARS AND THE SPECIAL CASE OF V123 IN M3

“…If an anomalous chemical composition is behind the aberrant light-curve shape of V123, the only plausible explanation remains the contamination of the atmosphere by the capture of a very small mass object during the evolution on the giant branch. The result of this scenario is, however, most probably an extreme-HB star instead of an RR Lyr (Bear & Soker 2011).…”

Tracking Advanced Planetary Systems (TAPAS) with HARPS-N

“…The outermost planet is expected to reach the stellar surface as well, but slightly later, when the stellar radius reaches a value of ≈75 R in about 130 mln yr. While the innermost planet will be most likely destroyed inside the stellar envelope (see Villaver & Livio 2007), the outcome for the outermost planet is more uncertain as, given its high mass, might provide enough angular momentum at the stellar surface to trigger the partial ejection of the envelope (García-Segura et al 2014) and/or become partially eroded and a close companion to the star (Bear & Soker 2011.…”

CIRCUMBINARY PLANETS ORBITING THE RAPIDLY PULSATING SUBDWARF B-TYPE BINARY NY Vir

“…The distance between the central EHB binary and the circumbinary planet is about 3.3 AU. By assuming the mass of the main-sequence (MS) progenitor of the EHB star is M M S = 1.0 M ⊙ , the orbital separation of the planet around the MS progenitor is estimated as (e.g., Bear & Soker 2011): a 0 ∼ = (M EH + M 2 )/(M M S + M 2 ) ≈ 1.74 AU (by ignoring tidal interaction). When the primary star evolved to a red giant branch star before the system entered a CE, it has a reached radius of ∼ 100 R ⊙ ∼ 0.5 AU.…”