2012
DOI: 10.1002/net.21465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectedness of finite distance graphs

Abstract: We describe a polynomial‐time algorithm for deciding whether a given distance graph with a finite number of vertices is connected. This problem was conjectured to be NP‐hard in Draque Penso et al. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, 2012

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naturally, when a network exhibits special structure, one can hope for faster algorithms, more accurate estimates, and different bounds. These themes are well‐represented in Networks , by studies on trees [10], planar graphs [28], partial k ‐trees [150], complete graphs [141], interval and permutation graphs [1], distance graphs [104], and/or graphs [149], and circulant graphs [148].…”
Section: Reliability: the Roads Traveledmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, when a network exhibits special structure, one can hope for faster algorithms, more accurate estimates, and different bounds. These themes are well‐represented in Networks , by studies on trees [10], planar graphs [28], partial k ‐trees [150], complete graphs [141], interval and permutation graphs [1], distance graphs [104], and/or graphs [149], and circulant graphs [148].…”
Section: Reliability: the Roads Traveledmentioning
confidence: 99%