2021
DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2021-5-84-89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connate water of the organocarbonate shale rocks of Domanic deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third factor has to do with differences of water amount in the rocks. According to Kazak et al [31,32], Bazhenov Formation rocks contain an order of magnitude which contain more water than Domanik Formation rocks (1-8 wt% and 0.1-0.5 wt%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third factor has to do with differences of water amount in the rocks. According to Kazak et al [31,32], Bazhenov Formation rocks contain an order of magnitude which contain more water than Domanik Formation rocks (1-8 wt% and 0.1-0.5 wt%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several aspects to consider when using anhydrous pyrolysis. Firstly, despite no water being used in the experiment, water is still present in the Domanik Formation sample [72][73][74], and it can also be naturally generated during the thermal cracking of kerogen [75]. Secondly, a number of EOR shale-oriented techniques utilize gases, such as high-pressure air injection with further self-pyrolysis [76] and CO 2 or N 2 injection [77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Kerogen Microstructural Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%