2013
DOI: 10.7589/2013-03-066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjunctivitis Associated with Chlamydia pecorum in Three Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Levels of C. pecorum infection appear to have remained stable, with PCR prevalence of 88% also found in a subset of the current 2012–13 koala cohort (n = 62) . That the first three reported cases of severe conjunctivitis confirmed as C. pecorum occurred in 2012, in the same timeframe as the current study, suggests an emergence of clinical chlamydiosis in Mount Lofty koalas during this period. This may be related to host or pathogen factors, with a recent study identifying lower prevalence of a virulence‐associated plasmid in C. pecorum strains isolated from SA koalas compared with those from the eastern states…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Levels of C. pecorum infection appear to have remained stable, with PCR prevalence of 88% also found in a subset of the current 2012–13 koala cohort (n = 62) . That the first three reported cases of severe conjunctivitis confirmed as C. pecorum occurred in 2012, in the same timeframe as the current study, suggests an emergence of clinical chlamydiosis in Mount Lofty koalas during this period. This may be related to host or pathogen factors, with a recent study identifying lower prevalence of a virulence‐associated plasmid in C. pecorum strains isolated from SA koalas compared with those from the eastern states…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…However, the markedly lower apparent prevalence of p Cpec in South Australian koala samples (11 %) (Table 4 , Additional file 6 : Table S4) relative to koala samples from QLD, Vic, and NSW (73 – 84 %) appears worthy of further investigation. Anecdotal evidence and preliminary PCR-based screening studies [ 58 ] (Speight K.N., Polkinghorne A., Penn R., Boardman W., Timms P., Fraser T., Johnson K., Faull R., Bate S., Woolford L., 2015, unpublished observations), suggest that C. pecorum infections in SA may be less common and pathogenic than those described in eastern and northern Australian states (QLD and NSW) [ 17 ]. Similarly low prevalence of chlamydial disease has been proposed for Victorian koalas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also reported was a diabetes syndrome affecting koalas in care that could impact on the rehabilitation success of koalas in Queensland, a species now listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act 1999 [37]. The first two confirmed clinical cases of chlamydiosis in koalas in South Australia were reported to the AWHN through the pilot project [39]. The South Australian koala population was thought to be free of Chlamydia [40], so these reports may be an indicator of an emerging disease in the South Australian koala population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%