2009
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2009.2015177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjugate-Prior-Penalized Learning of Gaussian Mixture Models for Multifunction Myoelectric Hand Control

Abstract: This paper presents a new learning method for Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) to improve their generalization ability. A traditional maximum a posterior (MAP) parameter estimate is used to achieve regularization based on conjugate priors. Plus, a model order selection criterion is derived from Bayesian-Laplace approaches, using the conjugate priors to measure the uncertainty of the estimated parameters. As a result, the proposed learning method avoids the possibility of convergence toward the boundary of the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the use of low-density sEMG signals represents an important advantage for the acceptance of prostheses by amputees, according with Khushaba et al (2012), who state that reduction in the number of electrodes, without compromising the classification accuracy, would significantly simplify the requirements for controlling state of the art prostheses. From the studies which considered dexterous gestures, Chu and Lee (2009) only included two grasp gestures (cylindrical and lateral grasps). On the other hand, Khezri and Jahed (2007) identified six gestures combined hand and wrist gestures, and only one grasp gesture is considered in comparison with five gestures reported in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the use of low-density sEMG signals represents an important advantage for the acceptance of prostheses by amputees, according with Khushaba et al (2012), who state that reduction in the number of electrodes, without compromising the classification accuracy, would significantly simplify the requirements for controlling state of the art prostheses. From the studies which considered dexterous gestures, Chu and Lee (2009) only included two grasp gestures (cylindrical and lateral grasps). On the other hand, Khezri and Jahed (2007) identified six gestures combined hand and wrist gestures, and only one grasp gesture is considered in comparison with five gestures reported in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such attempts did not included more complex dexterous movements, in which statistical-based features are not sufficiently reliable due to the weak signals from these movements. Previous works did consider sEMG signals from dexterous movements, but only for grasp gestures, aiming to improve the functionality of the prosthetic control (Chu and Lee, 2009;Hargrove et al, 2009;Khezri and Jahed, 2007;Tommasi et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013). In fact, the non-linear relationship between force and electric activity of muscles at low-levels of contraction (Naik et al, 2010) makes much more difficult the sEMG signals analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A global search method, referred to as a conjugate-prior-penalized learning algorithm, was proposed for the learning of GMMs (Chu and Lee 2009). This learning method provided stable parameter and model order estimates using the conjugate priors of the GMM.…”
Section: Gaussian Mixture Model Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different features have been used in pattern recognition involving both time domain and time-frequency domain features. Some of these include mean absolute value [11,12,15-17], zero crossings (ZC) [11,12,15-17], slope sign changes (SSC) [11,12,15,16], autoregressive (AR) model coefficients [12,15,18-20], cepstrum coefficients [19], waveform length (WL) [11,12,16,17] and wavelet packet transform[13-15]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been done to classify the features extracted from the sEMG like neural networks [11,20,21], bayesian classifier [24], linear discriminant analysis [16,23], hidden markov model [26], multilayer perceptron [13,14,23], fuzzy classifier [15,17-19], gaussian mixture model [12] and support vector machines (SVM) [21,22,27,28]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%