Abstract:The prevalence of conjugate margin terminology and studies in the scientific literature is testimony to the contribution that this concept and approach has made to the study of passive margins, and more broadly extensional tectonics. However, when applied to the complex rift, transform, and spreading system of the southern North Atlantic (i.e., the passive margins of Newfoundland, Labrador, Ireland, Iberia, and southern Greenland), it becomes obvious that at these passive continental margin settings, additiona… Show more
“…The computed total ~185 km of extension for the Orphan Basin during the Mesozoic (Figures 2 and 4f,g) is compatible with reported observations (MacMahon et al., 2020; Peace & Welford, 2020). Our orthogonal setting has a NAM‐FL pole of rotation far from Flemish Cap, in contrast to previous estimations (Sibuet et al., 2007; see Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Euler stage poles represent relative motions for plates and microplates (different colors) (Angrand et al., 2020; Lundin & Doré, 2019; Reid, 1988; Sandoval et al., 2019; Sibuet et al, 2007). Necking lines outline the boundaries of the rigid continental blocks (Figure 3; Angrand et al., 2020; Gómez et al, 2019; King et al., 2020; Nirrengarten et al., 2018; Peace & Welford, 2020). Symbols refer to our and previous global kinematic models that do not separate Iberia in numerous continental blocks (Barnett Moore et al, 2016; Nirrengarten et al., 2018; Van Hinsbergen et al., 2020).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This four‐step approach has achieved outstanding results in reconstructing global plate motions at divergent settings (Müller et al, 2019). However, problems arise when obliquely deforming continental regions are considered, as shown for the Iberian case (Angrand et al., 2020; Barnett‐Moore et al., 2016; Peace & Welford, 2020; Tavani et al., 2018). During a large part of its Mesozoic history, Iberia was a continental rigid block delimited by intracontinental deforming regions, 40–200 km wide (Ady & Whittaker, 2019; Angrand et al., 2020; King et al., 2020) and hereafter referred to as strike‐slip corridors.…”
Despite considerable progress in restoring rifted margins, none of the current kinematic models can restore the Mesozoic motion of the Iberian block in full agreement with the circum‐Iberian geology. This conflict requires a revision of the kinematic description at the onset of divergence. The circum‐Iberian region has a unique geological dataset that allows calibration and testing of kinematic reconstructions and therefore it is an ideal candidate for testing intracontinental restoration approaches. Here we define intracontinental deforming regions, referred to as strike‐slip corridors, based on alignments of Mesozoic rift basins and/or transfer zones bordering rigid continental blocks. We use these strike‐slip corridors and data from the southern N‐Atlantic and Tethys to define the motion path of the Flemish Cap, Ebro and Iberia continental blocks. The resulting Mesozoic kinematic model for the Iberian block is compatible with recently published data and interpretations describing the Mesozoic circum‐Iberian geology. Large‐scale intracontinental strike‐slip corridors may offer a valid boundary condition for reconstructing continental block motion at the onset of divergence in intracontinental settings.
“…The computed total ~185 km of extension for the Orphan Basin during the Mesozoic (Figures 2 and 4f,g) is compatible with reported observations (MacMahon et al., 2020; Peace & Welford, 2020). Our orthogonal setting has a NAM‐FL pole of rotation far from Flemish Cap, in contrast to previous estimations (Sibuet et al., 2007; see Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Euler stage poles represent relative motions for plates and microplates (different colors) (Angrand et al., 2020; Lundin & Doré, 2019; Reid, 1988; Sandoval et al., 2019; Sibuet et al, 2007). Necking lines outline the boundaries of the rigid continental blocks (Figure 3; Angrand et al., 2020; Gómez et al, 2019; King et al., 2020; Nirrengarten et al., 2018; Peace & Welford, 2020). Symbols refer to our and previous global kinematic models that do not separate Iberia in numerous continental blocks (Barnett Moore et al, 2016; Nirrengarten et al., 2018; Van Hinsbergen et al., 2020).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This four‐step approach has achieved outstanding results in reconstructing global plate motions at divergent settings (Müller et al, 2019). However, problems arise when obliquely deforming continental regions are considered, as shown for the Iberian case (Angrand et al., 2020; Barnett‐Moore et al., 2016; Peace & Welford, 2020; Tavani et al., 2018). During a large part of its Mesozoic history, Iberia was a continental rigid block delimited by intracontinental deforming regions, 40–200 km wide (Ady & Whittaker, 2019; Angrand et al., 2020; King et al., 2020) and hereafter referred to as strike‐slip corridors.…”
Despite considerable progress in restoring rifted margins, none of the current kinematic models can restore the Mesozoic motion of the Iberian block in full agreement with the circum‐Iberian geology. This conflict requires a revision of the kinematic description at the onset of divergence. The circum‐Iberian region has a unique geological dataset that allows calibration and testing of kinematic reconstructions and therefore it is an ideal candidate for testing intracontinental restoration approaches. Here we define intracontinental deforming regions, referred to as strike‐slip corridors, based on alignments of Mesozoic rift basins and/or transfer zones bordering rigid continental blocks. We use these strike‐slip corridors and data from the southern N‐Atlantic and Tethys to define the motion path of the Flemish Cap, Ebro and Iberia continental blocks. The resulting Mesozoic kinematic model for the Iberian block is compatible with recently published data and interpretations describing the Mesozoic circum‐Iberian geology. Large‐scale intracontinental strike‐slip corridors may offer a valid boundary condition for reconstructing continental block motion at the onset of divergence in intracontinental settings.
“…Several petroliferous Mesozoic sedimentary basins (e.g., the Orphan Basin, the Flemish Pass Basin and the Jeanne d'Arc Basin) are located offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, eastern Canada, which were formed during the Late Triassic to Early Jurassic rifting that proceeded to the opening of the modern North Atlantic Ocean [1][2][3] (Figure 1B). On the conjugate Irish Atlantic margin, several basins were formed at approximately the same time (Late Triassic to Early Jurassic; e.g., the Rockall Basin and the Porcupine Basin; [4][5][6][7][8]; Figure 1C). While separation of the Irish continental margin from its conjugate pair, the Orphan Basin region, through seafloor spreading that occurred during the Mid-extensive, reaching as far north as between Canada and Greenland possibly as early as the Triassic [11][12][13], with simultaneous, intermittent rifting episodes affecting the Rockall [4,14] and Orphan [2,15] basins during the entire Jurassic period.…”
Reconstructions of the opening of the North Atlantic Ocean generally result in the Orphan Basin, offshore Newfoundland, Canada, lying approximately conjugate to the rift basins on the Irish Atlantic margin at the onset of seafloor spreading toward the end of the Early Cretaceous. Most of these plate reconstructions have involved rigid plates with plate motions based solely on the interpretation of oceanic magnetic anomalies. In particular, these reconstructions often show the Rockall Basin, west of Ireland, forming a continuous Mesozoic basin with the West Orphan Basin, offshore Newfoundland. However, more recent plate reconstructions involving deformable plates have called this conjugate relationship into question. The goal of this study is to investigate the validity of this potentially continuous basin system by reconstructing and restoring present-day seismically-constrained geological models both spatially and temporally back to their original configurations pre-rift. By comparing the reconstructions in terms of sedimentary package thicknesses and crustal thicknesses in 3D, using both rigid and deformable plate reconstructions to orient the reconstructed models, we are able to test different basin connectivity scenarios using a multidisciplinary approach. Our analysis provides subsurface geophysical support for the hypothesis that the Rockall Basin was originally conjugate to and continuous with the East Orphan Basin during Jurassic rifting, later linking to the West Orphan Basin as rifting evolved during the Early Cretaceous. This complex basin evolution example highlights the need for using 3D rifting mechanism models to properly understand the fundamental driving forces during rifting and has significant implications for assessing basin prospectivity across conjugate margin pairs.
“…(e.g., Nirrengarten et al, 2018). The importance of including these blocks is shown in Peace and Welford (2020). Essentially, these blocks play an important kinematic role and I do not think that Iberia can be accurately reconstructed without including these blocks.…”
This short paper by Angrand et al. makes some interesting and relevant points regarding the evolution of Iberia. The description of geological events that shaped the region is detailed and well organised, needing only minor modifications and clarifications in my opinion. The subject of the paper is very timely and is suitable for Solid Earth. However, I felt that the paper required further work to be suitable for publication. In particular, the description of the methodology, the quality of the figures and some other aspects outlined below need improving. Thus, my overall recommendation is revision of the manuscript as it think it has the potential to make a good contribution to Solid C1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.