2015
DOI: 10.1090/proc/12645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conjugacy class conditions in locally compact second countable groups

Abstract: Abstract. Many non-locally compact second countable groups admit a comeagre conjugacy class. For example, this is the case for S∞, Aut(Q, <), and, less trivially, Aut(R) for R the random graph [Truss]. A. Kechris and C. Rosendal ask if a non-trivial locally compact second countable group can admit a comeagre conjugacy class. We answer the question in the negative via an analysis of locally compact second countable groups with topological conditions on a conjugacy class.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For matrix groups, the spectrum is a continuous conjugacy invariant and this fact essentially proves that there is no dense conjugacy class. Actually, Wesolek proved that no locally compact second countable group has a dense conjugacy class [Wes16].…”
Section: Automatic Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For matrix groups, the spectrum is a continuous conjugacy invariant and this fact essentially proves that there is no dense conjugacy class. Actually, Wesolek proved that no locally compact second countable group has a dense conjugacy class [Wes16].…”
Section: Automatic Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, P.Wesolek [7] has recently proved that locally compact Polish groups cannot have comeager conjugacy classes. We present an example of a locally compact group G such that every diagonal action of G on G n+1 , n ∈ AE, by conjugation has a dense orbit (Corollary 6.4.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%