2013
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congruent morphological and genetic differentiation as a signature of range expansion in a fragmented landscape

Abstract: Phenotypic differentiation is often interpreted as a result of local adaptation of individuals to their environment. Here, we investigated the skull morphological differentiation in 11 populations of the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus). These populations were sampled in an agricultural landscape in the Montérégie region (Québec, Canada), at the northern edge of the distribution of the white-footed mouse. We found a strong pattern of phenotypic differentiation matching the genetic structure across thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(153 reference statements)
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the DRB gene, we still detected two distinct clusters, but surprisingly populations from the East Coast appeared closer to populations from the northern shore of the St Lawrence river and the population from the Great Lakes region, than to populations from the southern shore of the St Lawrence river. Further sub-structure was detected among the populations south of the St Lawrence river, with an effect of the Richelieu river, as previously shown using neutral microsatellite markers (Rogic et al 2013;Marrotte et al 2014) and based on the morphological variation in skull shape (Ledevin and Millien 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…With the DRB gene, we still detected two distinct clusters, but surprisingly populations from the East Coast appeared closer to populations from the northern shore of the St Lawrence river and the population from the Great Lakes region, than to populations from the southern shore of the St Lawrence river. Further sub-structure was detected among the populations south of the St Lawrence river, with an effect of the Richelieu river, as previously shown using neutral microsatellite markers (Rogic et al 2013;Marrotte et al 2014) and based on the morphological variation in skull shape (Ledevin and Millien 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…). Using neutral genetic markers and landmark data from the skull, we detected a strong geographical differentiation of populations of the white‐footed mouse across forest patches within our study area (Ledevin and Millien ; Rogic et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…). Small forest patches are often surrounded by less suitable habitats which may hinder dispersion and promote genetic and morphological differentiation between isolated populations (Klein and Cameron ; Munshi‐South ; Ledevin and Millien ; Rogic et al. ; R. R. Marrotte, A. Gonzalez, and V. Millien unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This re‐colonization process may have occurred via a series of successive founder events (e.g. Gracia et al ., ; Schulte et al ., ), a process that may also have played a role in other species occurring in Quebec (Ledevin & Millien, ). These successive founder events would have further structured populations spatially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic drift can also influence phenotypic variation, especially in the context of changing environmental conditions. These processes are non‐exclusive, and the morphology of individuals in a population may reflect an interaction between them (Renaud & Michaux, ; Ackermann & Cheverud, ; Ledevin & Millien, ). Identifying the environmental factors that are correlated with variation in size and shape of a structure may help better understand how these factors influence the spatial patterns of morphological variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%