Congruence between residents’ and clinical instructors perceptions of teaching in outpatient care centres

Stritter, Frank T.; Baker, Richard; McGaghie, William C.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb01125.x

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It thus appears that residents have high expectations of attending doctors as instructors, which does not appear to be shared by the attending doctors. These results conflict with those of Stritter et al . (1983), who suggested concordance between teacher and house staff views on teaching in ambulatory medicine.…”

Section: Methods and Resultscontrasting

confidence: 99%

An inventory to improve clinical teaching in the general internal medicine clinic

Hewson

Jensen

1990

Medical Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing occurrence of outpatient medical care has led to the need for more and better medical education in the clinic. the Wisconsin Inventory of Clinic Teaching (WICT) was developed to improve the teaching of attending doctors in a general internal medicine clinic. The items on the inventory were derived from interviews with residents and attending doctors. The inventory was shown to have validity, and to be reliable with internal consistency correlations. We found an interesting disparity between attending doctors' and residents' expectations concerning clinical teaching. The instrument is in use as part of a teaching improvement programme for attending doctors in a general internal medicine clinic.

show abstract

Section: Methods and Resultscontrasting

confidence: 99%

An inventory to improve clinical teaching in the general internal medicine clinic

Hewson

Jensen

1990

Medical Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30] In addition, it has been shown that residents and clinical teachers hold congruent views on teaching behavior. 31 The evaluation of faculty teaching performance by learners has been researched and has been generally found to be valid and reliable. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37] Steiner et al • FACULTY EVALUATION INSTRUMENT Various tools for faculty assessment have been developed in different settings: from classroom teaching to the teaching of learners in the clinical environment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Faculty Evaluation by Residents in an Emergency Medicine Program: A New Evaluation Instrument

Steiner

Franc-Law

Kelly

et al. 2000

Academic Emergency Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Objective: Evaluation of preceptors in training programs is essential; however, little research has been performed in the setting of the emergency department (ED). The goal of this pilot study was to determine the validity and reliability of a faculty evaluation instrument-the Emergency Rotation (ER) scale-developed specifically for use in emergency medicine (EM). Methods: A prospective study comparing the ER scale with two alternative faculty evaluation instruments was completed in three of the five EDs affiliated with an EM teaching program, where emergency physicians are members of the clinical teaching faculty. The participants were 18 residents (postgraduate years 1, 2, and 3) who were completing four-week clinical rotations in EM. Residents at the end of the rotation recorded their evaluations of each emergency physician with whom they had clinical encounters on the following evaluation tools: the ER scale, a longer validated scale (Irby), and a global assessment scale (GAS). Domain scores were correlated with the previously validated scale and the GAS to determine validity using a multitrait-multimethod matrix. The reliability of the ER scale was measured using a Chronbach's alpha coefficient. Results: Forty-eight preceptor evaluations were completed on 29 individual preceptors. The rating of preceptors was high using the ER scale (median: 16 of 20; IQR: 13, 18), Irby (median: 300 of 378; IQR: 267, 321), or GAS (mean: 7.8 of 10; SD: 1.3). Domain scores for each tool were used in the multitrait-multimethod matrix and the correlations between a previously validated tool and the ER scale were found to be high (>0.70) in the various domains. The internal consistency of the ER scale was also high (r = 0.85). Conclusions:The ER scale appears to be valid and reliable. It performs well when compared with previously psychometrically tested tools. It is a sensible, welladapted tool for the teaching environment offered by EM.

show abstract

Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting

Skeff

1988

J Gen Intern Med

132

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Congruence between residents’ and clinical instructors perceptions of teaching in outpatient care centres

Cited by 8 publications

References 5 publications

An inventory to improve clinical teaching in the general internal medicine clinic

An inventory to improve clinical teaching in the general internal medicine clinic

Faculty Evaluation by Residents in an Emergency Medicine Program: A New Evaluation Instrument

Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About