2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congestive Heart Failure Incidence and Prognosis: Case Identification Using Central Adjudication Versus Hospital Discharge Diagnoses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods for determining HF presence varied across studies, especially when chart review was used as the reference standard. Seven studies accepted HF diagnosis documented in the chart (12,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and four studies used documented HF diagnosis or a combination of clinical judgement based on information in the chart (eg, test results, diagnostics) (22)(23)(24)(25). Eight studies (15,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) ascertained HF presence based on diagnostic criteria used by scoring systems from Framingham, Carlson, Boston, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) or the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for determining HF presence varied across studies, especially when chart review was used as the reference standard. Seven studies accepted HF diagnosis documented in the chart (12,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) and four studies used documented HF diagnosis or a combination of clinical judgement based on information in the chart (eg, test results, diagnostics) (22)(23)(24)(25). Eight studies (15,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) ascertained HF presence based on diagnostic criteria used by scoring systems from Framingham, Carlson, Boston, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) or the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CV events were adjudicated using hospital discharge summaries, diagnostic test reports, surgery and radiology findings, and consultation reports (23). HF, which may be systolic or diastolic, was defined using an algorithm that included a physician diagnosis of HF, documentation of symptoms and physical signs of HF, evidence of pulmonary edema, and specific medical treatment for HF (24). Echocardiography results, when available, were also considered during adjudication.…”
Section: Ascertainment Of Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding these shortcomings, the study highlights the importance of central adjudication of HF cases for epidemiologic studies. In summary, there is no current "gold standard" for identifying incident HF cases with minimum misclassification bias, central adjudication by a committee is essential for assessing HF in epidemiological studies (37)(38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Heart Failure Assessment In Primary Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hospital discharge data are influenced by reimbursement codes as well as inconsistencies in coding practices (41 (38). In summary, there is no current "gold standard" for identifying incident HF cases with minimum misclassification 9 bias, central adjudication by a committee is essential for population studies because this method has a relatively higher specificity (37)(38)(39)(40)42). …”
Section: Heart Failure Assessment In Secondary Data Collection -Hospimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation