2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3047394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congestion Pattern Prediction for a Busy Traffic Zone Based on the Hidden Markov Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occasionally, in a busy traffic zone, congestion patterns on multiple connected roads can make a complete jam of the network zone. To address this issue, Sun et al [23] recommended a prediction model of congestion pattern in a heavily congested traffic area using the hidden markov model (HMM). The model initiates a connection between the external (observation state) and internal (hidden state) road traffic state of a busy traffic zone.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasionally, in a busy traffic zone, congestion patterns on multiple connected roads can make a complete jam of the network zone. To address this issue, Sun et al [23] recommended a prediction model of congestion pattern in a heavily congested traffic area using the hidden markov model (HMM). The model initiates a connection between the external (observation state) and internal (hidden state) road traffic state of a busy traffic zone.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model outperformed ARIMA in terms of overall performance. The authors suggested a MapReduce-based distributed long short-term memory (LSTM) with a temporal window and normal distribution that outperformed previous LSTM models (Sun et al , 2021). The authors examined three traffic speed prediction algorithms: convolutional neural network (CNN), LSTM-NN and XGBoost, using a machine learning-based framework.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The execution time of the algorithm is linearly related to the number of geospatial objects, resulting in high time complexity and low semantic enrichment performance in the spatial connection process. For points of interest (POI), Sun et al used an implicit Markov model [19] to label the POI categories for staying segments of spatiotemporal trajectories, but in the regions with intensive POI, staying segments may be related to multiple interest points. Coupled with the low GPS sampling rate, it is difficult to identify effective POIs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%