2001
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.2.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Syphilis Surveillance and Newborn Evaluation in a Low-Incidence State

Abstract: Clinicians should adhere to standardized protocols in the evaluation and management of at-risk newborns. Vigilant screening prenatally and at delivery and adequate follow-up are critical to reduce congenital syphilis. Improved surveillance data and resources are needed for the identification and follow-up of newborns at risk for congenital syphilis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved surveillance data and resources are needed for identification and followup of newborns at risk for congenital syphilis [13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved surveillance data and resources are needed for identification and followup of newborns at risk for congenital syphilis [13]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] Recognised risk factors include lack of prenatal care, late entry into prenatal care, failure to repeat syphilis testing early during the third trimester, previous delivery of an infant with congenital syphilis, previous stillbirth, use of injecting drugs, exchange of sex for drugs or money, having an unwanted pregnancy, young age, rural residence, being unmarried, and having no father's name on the birth certificate. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] We found several related risk factors-namely, lack of prenatal care and serological testing for syphilis after 28 weeks' gestation, in our study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved surveillance data and resources are needed for identification and follow-up of newborns at risk for CS. [11]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%