1985
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198567040-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. Natural history and functional assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
69
0
9

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
69
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Most patients do not report pain or restriction of the flexion-extension arc. 2 We encountered 2 patients whose daily activities had been disturbed by painful snapping or locking of the elbow joint. Both patients had had congenital radioulnar synostosis with an anteriorly dislocated radial head.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Most patients do not report pain or restriction of the flexion-extension arc. 2 We encountered 2 patients whose daily activities had been disturbed by painful snapping or locking of the elbow joint. Both patients had had congenital radioulnar synostosis with an anteriorly dislocated radial head.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is common for congenital radioulnar synostosis to be diagnosed late, not immediately after birth, it is usually diagnosed at an earlier age than 16 years. In a series of patients with congenital radioulnar synostosis reported by Cleary and Omer the mean age of diagnosis was 6 years (range 6 months -22 years) [10]. Simmons et al reported the mean age at diagnosis to be 2.5 years of age [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The previously reported cases of snapping or locking elbow associated with congenital radioulnar synostosis are summarized in Table 2. 11,24 -29 Seven of the 9 cases presented in Table 2 were found in teenagers, and all their elbow radiographs, according to the Cleary and Omer classification, 30 were classified as type IV with an open epiphyseal plate. Thus, the growth spurt of the radius and an anterior dislocation of the radial head might be more susceptible to snapping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%