2017
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_245_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Should we continue lacrimal massage till 1 year or perform an office probing at 6 months? A clinical decision analysis approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was calculated using the WHO calculator, taking a confidence level of 95%, margin of error of 10%, and reported success rate of 84.2%. 4 The minimum estimated sample size came out to be 36 patients. Forty patients were included, among which five patients had epiphora in both eyes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample size was calculated using the WHO calculator, taking a confidence level of 95%, margin of error of 10%, and reported success rate of 84.2%. 4 The minimum estimated sample size came out to be 36 patients. Forty patients were included, among which five patients had epiphora in both eyes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spontaneous resolution usually occurs in 95% of cases within 12 months that is regarded as a normal variant. 4 Children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction may have associated conjunctivitis, dacryocystitis, mucocele or pyocele formation, and chronic disease may lead to lacrimal fistula formation. CNLDO can lead to serious complications, i.e., acute dacryocystitis, preseptal cellulitis, orbital cellulitis and frequent respiratory tract infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%