1964
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(64)80188-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital anomalies in the newborninfant, including minor variations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
111
2
8

Year Published

1967
1967
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
111
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We use "substantial departure" here to imply that a particular anomaly is found in a small fraction (typically <2.5%) of the population or, in the case of measurable anomalies, the measured sign falls outside the normal reference range for the population (> or <2 SD from the mean). A more liberal threshold (<4%) has been advocated by others [Marden et al, 1964;Merks et al, 2003]. Anomalies, either major or minor (including malformations, deformations, disruptions, dysplasias, and sequences), can occur as isolated phenomena or as component manifestations of broader patterns or syndromes and are causally heterogeneous.…”
Section: Anomaly Morphologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use "substantial departure" here to imply that a particular anomaly is found in a small fraction (typically <2.5%) of the population or, in the case of measurable anomalies, the measured sign falls outside the normal reference range for the population (> or <2 SD from the mean). A more liberal threshold (<4%) has been advocated by others [Marden et al, 1964;Merks et al, 2003]. Anomalies, either major or minor (including malformations, deformations, disruptions, dysplasias, and sequences), can occur as isolated phenomena or as component manifestations of broader patterns or syndromes and are causally heterogeneous.…”
Section: Anomaly Morphologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Marden et al [1964] defined a major anomaly as having "an adverse effect on either the function or social acceptability of the individual" and a minor anomaly as one that is "neither of medical nor cosmetic consequence to the patient." The self-image and social acceptability of individuals with morphologic anomalies are complex psychological and social issues [Marik and Hoag, 2012;Masnari et al, 2012], which should be distinguished from the medical or biological description of the anomaly.…”
Section: Anomaly Morphologicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of importance to present the correlation between the number of the minor anomalies and the risk for presence of major anomaly found in different sources of information: if the individual doesn't have any minor anomaly, the probability of existence of major anomaly is about 1.4%; one minor malformation carries a probability for major anomaly of 3%; if two minor malformations are present in the same person, the probability of existing major anomaly is about 11-15%, and if three or more minor anomalies are present, the probability of major anomaly, especially chromosomal abnormality, raises over 50% [22,23]. Less than 1% of newborns have three or more anomalies, and these newborns are at higher than 20% risk for a major malformation [24,25]. Another source of information presents that children who have two minor anomalies have a 10% risk of developing major anomalies, finally, those children with 3 or more minor anomalies have again a 20% risk of developing a major anomaly [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…without serious medical or cosmetic consequences, are excluded from the category of congenital malformations [7]. While minor anomalies in themselves do not greatly affect the child, they can be associated with major anomalies or be indications of certain syndromes [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%