“…9 Given this, Conventional prosthesis was chosen Case 1 malleostapedotomy via endaural approach on second surgery, facial nerve rolled, 0.6-mm window drilled using 0.4-mm Skeeter drill, piston wire prosthesis bent 20°, modified to 7-mm length and fixed on normal malleus Case 2 stapedotomy after "facial roll" and 0.6-mm window using 0.4-mm Skeeter drill, piston wire 7-mm-long used, transient House-Brackmann Grade III recovered by 1 month Case 1 Vestibulotomy using a pick then teflon prosthesis Case 2 tragal cartilage, incus long process with bone cement as complex at footplate, postoperative hearing gain 42 dB and air conducting hearing level 20 dB on right side Transcanal approach for exploratory tympanotomy and malleostapedotomy, hearing improved but deteriorated in long term Inner ear fenestration in 3 followed by piston; exploratory tympanotomy only in 1; hearing improved in all cases after surgery and to within 25 db in two and within 45 db in one both conventional hearing aids and passive or active bone conduction devices remain viable options, especially in bilateral cases. 7,13 Long term hearing improvement has been notable in these novel active bone conduction devices in recent reports. 12 For unilateral cases, no consensus has been reached but recent literature points to a more aggressive approach that involves surgically correcting the unilateral loss for better hearing in noise and sound localization.…”