2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00335-010-9252-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenic and bioinformatics analyses resolved a major-effect Fob3b QTL on mouse Chr 15 into two closely linked loci

Abstract: We previously identified a Chr 15 quantitative trait locus (QTL) Fob3b in lines of mice selected for high (Fat line) and low (Lean line) body fat content that represent a unique model of polygenic obesity. Here we genetically dissected the Fob3b interval by analyzing the phenotypes of eight overlapping congenic lines and four F(2) congenic intercrosses and prioritized candidates by bioinformatics approaches. Analyses revealed that the Fob3b QTL consists of at least two separate linked QTLs Fob3b1 and Fob3b2. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, GSTA4 has been shown to be a modifier of susceptibility to nonmelanoma skin cancer in humans (Abel et al 2010). As described in the current study, analyses of skin tumor promotion susceptibility using interval specific subcongenic mouse strains indicate that Psl1 is a compound locus made up of a cluster of subloci (see Figure 1), similar to other QTL affecting complex traits such as blood pressure (reviewed in Rapp and Joe 2012), diabetes (Granhall et al 2006), body composition (Diament and Warden 2004; Farber and Medrano 2007; Ishikawa et al 2007; Prevorsek et al 2010), and cancer (Samuelson et al 2005, 2007). Inheritance of Psl1.1a , Psl1.2a , Psl1.2b , and Gsta4 from DBA/2 results in increased susceptibility to skin tumor promotion whereas inheritance of Psl1.1b and Psl1.2c from DBA/2 results in decreased susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In addition, GSTA4 has been shown to be a modifier of susceptibility to nonmelanoma skin cancer in humans (Abel et al 2010). As described in the current study, analyses of skin tumor promotion susceptibility using interval specific subcongenic mouse strains indicate that Psl1 is a compound locus made up of a cluster of subloci (see Figure 1), similar to other QTL affecting complex traits such as blood pressure (reviewed in Rapp and Joe 2012), diabetes (Granhall et al 2006), body composition (Diament and Warden 2004; Farber and Medrano 2007; Ishikawa et al 2007; Prevorsek et al 2010), and cancer (Samuelson et al 2005, 2007). Inheritance of Psl1.1a , Psl1.2a , Psl1.2b , and Gsta4 from DBA/2 results in increased susceptibility to skin tumor promotion whereas inheritance of Psl1.1b and Psl1.2c from DBA/2 results in decreased susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The largest-effect DMI QTL region (14_17 Mb; Table 4) included genes that have previously been associated with several aspects of feed efficiency ( NDUFB9 , RNF139 ) in beef cattle [28, 82] and Type 2 diabetes ( MTSS1 ) in humans [83]. Moreover, all of the positional candidate genes near the largest-effect DMI QTL (14_17 Mb; Table 4) were also immediately flanked by SQLE (14_16.7 Mb), a cholesterol biosynthesis enzyme previously implicated as a primary positional candidate for a large-effect obesity QTL in mice [84, 85]. Proximal to the second largest-effect SimAngus DMI QTL, we detected SV2B (21_16 Mb; Table 4), which may be involved in aspects of regulated insulin secretion [86], and has been associated with human weight-loss across a diverse array of dietary regimes [87].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lean mice (4% of body weight is fat mass) exhibit metabolically healthy leanness 4 , not lipodystrophy. The major quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying divergent adiposity between Lean mice and their counter-selected Fat mouse line (23% of body weight is fat mass) were described 5, 6 , facilitating our search for positional candidate lean genes. Direct experimental evidence 7 and QTL mapping also ruled out known brain-regulated appetite and energy expenditure ( Lep , Lepr , Npy , Mc4r ) systems as driving adiposity divergence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%