2018 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings 2019
DOI: 10.1119/perc.2018.pr.turpen
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confusion and representational practices as factors that sustain rich pedagogical discussions within faculty online learning communities

Abstract: We present analysis of an exemplary case of rich and extended pedagogical reasoning about energy representations among physics faculty participating in the Next Generation Physical Science and Everyday Thinking Faculty Online Learning Community (FOLC). Our analysis is driven by the question, "What drives and sustains this prolonged and substantive pedagogical discussion?" We argue that this discussion was partially sustained through two factors: (1) the substantive confusion (for students and educators) that i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a FOLC is offered for faculty implementing the Next Gen PET curriculum. This FOLC has seen similar positive impacts as we report for the NFW-FOLC [58][59][60]. This model has been used in other STEM disciplines as well [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For example, a FOLC is offered for faculty implementing the Next Gen PET curriculum. This FOLC has seen similar positive impacts as we report for the NFW-FOLC [58][59][60]. This model has been used in other STEM disciplines as well [61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For the present study, we draw on survey data and the transcript of one FOLC meeting. Analyses involving the other data sources have been reported elsewhere, or are in preparation (Corrales et al, 2020 ; Corrales, Goldberg, Turpen, & Price, 2018 ; Lau, Corrales, Goldberg, & Turpen, 2019 ; Turpen, Goldberg, Corrales, & Price, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As participants share implementation challenges (and successes), members can respond in a variety of ways that either open-up or close-off the conversation to others’ contributions. In many FOLC meetings, we see people offer specific solutions, ask probing questions, share their own experience, normalize the experience of others, offer encouragement, bounce around ideas, and develop pedagogical concepts (Corrales et al, 2020 ; Lau et al, 2019 ; Turpen et al, 2018 ). The frequency and quality of these different interactions can vary, however, and is the subject of ongoing study (Lau et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faculty Online Learning Communities (FOLCs) are a promising solution to this problem [5][6][7]. Based on the design of in-person Faculty Learning Communities [8], FOLCs connect faculty members via periodic video conference calls with the goal of supporting their teaching development and implementation of RBISs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During their online meetings, FOLC members troubleshoot issues with the course, curriculum, and/or pedagogical strategy they are trying to implement. These conversations are often rich with pedagogical ideas and advice [6,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%