2021
DOI: 10.1086/711636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting the “I Don’t Know”: A Philosophical Consideration of Applying Abductive Reasoning to Library Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their focus, therefore, simultaneously centers on systems and users, which is a well-rounded but not easily classifiable approach. Labaree and Scimeca (2021) follow a similar path, initially writing that “the patron-centered condition of not knowing is the focus of this study,” thus situating themselves as user-oriented cognitivists, while simultaneously maintaining “that in science and in librarianship, truth will eventually prevail from acts of further observation and obtaining more facts,” a position far more compatible with strict positivism (Labaree and Scimeca, 2021, p. 81-98). This conflation between cognitivism and positivism, between systems-centered and user-centered approaches, dates back to early development of uncertainty as an object of discourse in HIB:In the 1980s, discussions of uncertainty became more deeply engaged with the user-centered perspective arising in information behavior research.…”
Section: Textual Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their focus, therefore, simultaneously centers on systems and users, which is a well-rounded but not easily classifiable approach. Labaree and Scimeca (2021) follow a similar path, initially writing that “the patron-centered condition of not knowing is the focus of this study,” thus situating themselves as user-oriented cognitivists, while simultaneously maintaining “that in science and in librarianship, truth will eventually prevail from acts of further observation and obtaining more facts,” a position far more compatible with strict positivism (Labaree and Scimeca, 2021, p. 81-98). This conflation between cognitivism and positivism, between systems-centered and user-centered approaches, dates back to early development of uncertainty as an object of discourse in HIB:In the 1980s, discussions of uncertainty became more deeply engaged with the user-centered perspective arising in information behavior research.…”
Section: Textual Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such research can slip into “an oversimplified linear model […] in which uncertainty represents a lack of information, which leads to information seeking and searching, which leads to uncertainty reduction” (Brashers and Hogan, 2013, p. 1241). Within this linear framework, uncertainty is that “noxious condition” of the individual which inhibits rational decision-making (Kamal and Burkell, 2011, p. 388; Labaree and Scimeca, 2021, p. 82).…”
Section: Textual Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We say "presents a query" instead of "ask a question" because we recognize that when members of the reading public walk into the library, they bring a multi-layered identity construct from which the question is an outcome and a representation of their humanity. Thus, the patron is the expert on the question, seeking to share their expertise of what they know and do not know with an information professional to arrive at an analyzed, authoritative resolution (Labaree & Scimeca, 2021). Because people walk with their understandings and literacies (i.e., ways of reading and knowing), questions are more than questions in a library context -they are queries.…”
Section: The Query Search Methods (Qsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%