Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics

Abstract

In the atmosphere, microphysics refers to the microscale processes that affect cloud and precipitation particles and is a key linkage among the various components of Earth's atmospheric water and energy cycles. The representation of microphysical processes in models continues to pose a major challenge leading to uncertainty in numerical weather forecasts and climate simulations. In this paper, the problem of treating microphysics in models is divided into two parts: (i) how to represent the population of cloud and precipitation particles, given the impossibility of simulating all particles individually within a cloud, and (ii) uncertainties in the microphysical process rates owing to fundamental gaps in knowledge of cloud physics. The recently developed Lagrangian particle‐based method is advocated as a way to address several conceptual and practical challenges of representing particle populations using traditional bulk and bin microphysics parameterization schemes. For addressing critical gaps in cloud physics knowledge, sustained investment for observational advances from laboratory experiments, new probe development, and next‐generation instruments in space is needed. Greater emphasis on laboratory work, which has apparently declined over the past several decades relative to other areas of cloud physics research, is argued to be an essential ingredient for improving process‐level understanding. More systematic use of natural cloud and precipitation observations to constrain microphysics schemes is also advocated. Because it is generally difficult to quantify individual microphysical process rates from these observations directly, this presents an inverse problem that can be viewed from the standpoint of Bayesian statistics. Following this idea, a probabilistic framework is proposed that combines elements from statistical and physical modeling. Besides providing rigorous constraint of schemes, there is an added benefit of quantifying uncertainty systematically. Finally, a broader hierarchical approach is proposed to accelerate improvements in microphysics schemes, leveraging the advances described in this paper related to process modeling (using Lagrangian particle‐based schemes), laboratory experimentation, cloud and precipitation observations, and statistical methods.

Assessing the Potential of Deep Learning for Emulating Cloud Superparameterization in Climate Models With Real‐Geography Boundary Conditions

“…scale (Blossey et al, 2016;Morrison et al, 2020;Schneider et al, 2017). This discrepancy creates large uncertainties about the precise details of deep convection on cloud feedbacks and climate change (Bony et al, 2015).…”

Meteorological Conditions and Cloud Effects on Surface Radiation Balance Near Helheim Glacier and Jakobshavn Isbræ (Greenland) Using Ground-Based Observations

“…The representation of microphysical processes in general circulation models remains a considerable challenge leading to uncertainty in numerical weather forecasts and climate simulations (see the review by (Morrison et al, 2020)). For example, in a recent paper, Hofer et al (2019) showed that the liquid and ice phases of cloud particles had a strong influence on simulations of future GrIS melting.…”

Predicting the morphology of ice particles in deep convection using the super-droplet method: development and evaluation of SCALE-SDM 0.2.5-2.2.0, -2.2.1, and -2.2.2

“…This criterion is based on the riming categories in Fig. 5 of Mosimann et al (1994), in which 0.3 corresponds to a densely rimed ice crystal. If the maximum dimension of a graupel particle is > 5 mm, we consider it a hailstone.…”