2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315259642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting Prejudice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, some experts claimed that nowadays some individuals do not pay serious attention toward few SNSs because of age factor and education-level (Jha & Ye, 2016). Likewise, our findings regarding SAs are related to the previous studies where researchers suggested a positive influence of distinct SAs for distinct business objectives (Hew et al, 2015; Logan et al, 2017; Thelwall & Vis, 2017; Zhu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, some experts claimed that nowadays some individuals do not pay serious attention toward few SNSs because of age factor and education-level (Jha & Ye, 2016). Likewise, our findings regarding SAs are related to the previous studies where researchers suggested a positive influence of distinct SAs for distinct business objectives (Hew et al, 2015; Logan et al, 2017; Thelwall & Vis, 2017; Zhu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Second, in order to explore the influence of SAs, six renowned applications were used, that is, Twitter, WhatsApp, WeChat, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat and Instagram as adopted from distinct previous studies (e.g., M. Bulearca & Bulearca, 2010; Lien & Cao, 2014; Logan et al, 2017). Third, SNSs were measured using seven most popular sites, that is, LinkedIn, Facebook, Tumblr, YouTube, Twitter, Weibo and Pinterest as adopted from previous studies (Howard et al, 2014; Naikwade & Sippy, 2014; Tiago & Verassimo, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations