Proceedings of 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2021) 2021
DOI: 10.22323/1.395.0867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting observations of VHE gamma-ray blazar flares with reconnection models

Abstract: Several models have been suggested to explain the fast gamma-ray variability observed in blazars, but its origin is still debated. One scenario is magnetic reconnection, a process that can efficiently convert magnetic energy to energy of relativistic particles accelerated in the reconnection layer. In our study, we compare results from state-of-the-art particle-in-cell simulations with observations of blazars at Very High Energy (VHE, E > 100 GeV) gamma-rays. Our goal is to test our model predictions on fast g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Jormanainen et al (2021), we concluded that the simulations we produced with the bulk Lorentz factor Γ j = 4 (Piner & Edwards 2018) that was based on the literature value and a smaller half-length of the layer L the resulting fluxes were often 100−1000 times lower than those of the observed data. Because of this, we reran our simulations for this study with an increased Γ j and L to obtain fluxes closer to the observed values.…”
Section: Photon Flux Distributionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Jormanainen et al (2021), we concluded that the simulations we produced with the bulk Lorentz factor Γ j = 4 (Piner & Edwards 2018) that was based on the literature value and a smaller half-length of the layer L the resulting fluxes were often 100−1000 times lower than those of the observed data. Because of this, we reran our simulations for this study with an increased Γ j and L to obtain fluxes closer to the observed values.…”
Section: Photon Flux Distributionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Γ j = 4). This choice was based on our previous work, reported in Jormanainen et al (2021), where the lower Γ j and a shorter halflength of the reconnection layer L yielded us significantly lower fluxes than in the observed dataset of Mrk 421. For the simulations presented in this work, the initial values of Γ j and L were multiplied by 3 to obtain simulated fluxes in the observed range (see Figs.…”
Section: Significance Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation