2022
DOI: 10.18833/cf/20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting Failure: Building Confidence and Resilience in Undergraduate Researchers

Abstract: In this open-access book, authors from a range of disciplines—from geosciences to drama—capture how failure manifests and can be productively supported in a range of undergraduate research experiences. Whether the learning environment is a STEM research lab, a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE), a humanities summer undergraduate research experience, a library, or the stage, students can benefit from support when they experience a gap between an expected/desired result and their lived experie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 179 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, scientific literacy is a skill that students must continually develop throughout their scientific careers. To do so, undergraduate students should complete multiple guided modules, Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CURES) [ 61 63 ], and eventually transition to independent research projects outside the classroom. In doing so, they will continually develop their scientific literacy skills and prepare themselves for careers as scientific leaders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, scientific literacy is a skill that students must continually develop throughout their scientific careers. To do so, undergraduate students should complete multiple guided modules, Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CURES) [ 61 63 ], and eventually transition to independent research projects outside the classroom. In doing so, they will continually develop their scientific literacy skills and prepare themselves for careers as scientific leaders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%