2020
DOI: 10.1111/jch.14117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confounders of the aldosterone‐to‐renin ratio when used as a screening test in hypertensive patients: A critical analysis of the literature

Abstract: The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a common screening test for primary aldosteronism in hypertensives. However, there are many factors which could confound the ARR test result and reduce the accuracy of this test. The present review's objective is to identify these factors and to describe to what extent they affect the ARR. Our analysis revealed that sex, age, posture, and sodium-intake influence the ARR, whereas assay techniques do not. Race and body mass index have an uncertain effect on the ARR. We con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we deliberately wanted to avoid posture-related variations in renin and aldosterone levels as the upright position may have variable effects on plasma aldosterone. Previous research has indicated that the ARR is less variable when measured in the supine position [41]. An additional limitation was our somewhat small population sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, we deliberately wanted to avoid posture-related variations in renin and aldosterone levels as the upright position may have variable effects on plasma aldosterone. Previous research has indicated that the ARR is less variable when measured in the supine position [41]. An additional limitation was our somewhat small population sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, we deliberately wanted to avoid posture-related variations in renin and aldosterone levels. Previous research has indicated that the ARR is less variable when measured in the supine position [16], thus, the difference between successive measurements of the ARR may have even been greater when measured in the seated position. Additionally, research regarding posture and systematically higher or lower ARR values have been inconclusive [16], thus, we felt comfortable maintaining the widely used value of 30 as our cut-off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous research has indicated that the ARR is less variable when measured in the supine position [16], thus, the difference between successive measurements of the ARR may have even been greater when measured in the seated position. Additionally, research regarding posture and systematically higher or lower ARR values have been inconclusive [16], thus, we felt comfortable maintaining the widely used value of 30 as our cut-off. Our population was additionally placed on a fixed low sodium diet, as opposed to the recommended ad libitum diet according to current guidelines [1].…”
Section: Total=116mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous research has indicated that the ARR is less variable when measured in the supine position. [41] An additional limitation was our somewhat small population sizes. Having larger sample sizes would have Informed consent was obtained from all individuals who participated in the studies described in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%