2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2023.184133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational space exploration of cryo-EM structures by variability refinement

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model series were generated using the 3DVA display job using 10 frames. To better analyze motion associated with the first two variability components, a series of models were generated corresponding to each volume series using phenix.varref (39). Supplemental movies were generated with Chimera and ChimeraX.…”
Section: D Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model series were generated using the 3DVA display job using 10 frames. To better analyze motion associated with the first two variability components, a series of models were generated corresponding to each volume series using phenix.varref (39). Supplemental movies were generated with Chimera and ChimeraX.…”
Section: D Variability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 components were asked as output but the main movements are observed in the 3 first components, which were subjected to variability refinement. Each 20 maps originating from 3DVA were input to variability refinement (phenix.varref [18]) along with the final refined model. 50 models were generated for each map, with restraints adapted to the resolution of 3DVA calculations, and only the best model was kept for each map.…”
Section: Variability Analysis and Variability Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…114 For high-resolution maps (<4 Å), it is often possible to use standard interactive refinement tools adapted from x-ray crystallography such as REFMAC5 and Phenix, 115,116 which have been updated to account for the differences in how atoms scatter x-rays and electrons, 117,118 the differences in the data processing approaches 119 and the handling of initial models from machine learning methods 120,121 such as AlphaFold 31,32 and Modelangelo 122 and more recently the large numbers of structures coming from continuous heterogeneity analyses. 123 For lower resolution maps, the common approaches are rigid and flexible fitting using pieces from existing or modeled structures (as discussed below) and more CG modeling approaches (see Section 7).…”
Section: Flexible Fitting: Structural Refinement and Characterization...mentioning
confidence: 99%