1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf00708876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational sensitivity of polyether macrocycles to electrostatic potential: Partial atomic charges, molecular mechanics, and conformational prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shirts and Stolworthy [295] analysis of a crown ether (18-crown-6) showed that the electrostatic term is the largest contributor to the conformational energy and discussed the desirability of using a polarizable method, such as the charge equilibration algorithms, to include these effects in MM and MD calculations. During development of the FQ method by Berne and co-workers investigations of the aqueous solvation and reoganization energy of other molecules, notably formaldehyde, were performed [296,297].…”
Section: Application Of Polarizable Force Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shirts and Stolworthy [295] analysis of a crown ether (18-crown-6) showed that the electrostatic term is the largest contributor to the conformational energy and discussed the desirability of using a polarizable method, such as the charge equilibration algorithms, to include these effects in MM and MD calculations. During development of the FQ method by Berne and co-workers investigations of the aqueous solvation and reoganization energy of other molecules, notably formaldehyde, were performed [296,297].…”
Section: Application Of Polarizable Force Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we have performed standard MM/GBSA calculations for the seven biotin analogues with either the correct QM charges for each snapshot or with the other charge sets. To investigate the distance dependence of the effect, we have also used mixed charge sets, where the charges of all residues outside a certain distance from the ligand (we used 16 different distances, 3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,30,35, and 40 Å for the charged biotin analogues and 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,15,20,25,30,35, and 40 Å for the others) are changed to the approximate charges.…”
Section: Solvent-screened Interaction Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, charges on atoms that are buried by the other atoms are poorly determined, meaning that they may become unphysically large and that different charges may give fits of a similar quality1, 2. Second, it is well‐known that ESP charges depend quite strongly on the conformation of the molecule6–10. Several methods have been suggested to cure these problems, e.g., by fixing some charges11, fitting to several conformations simultaneously12, 13, fitting to the ESP of one conformation with restraints to the dipole moment of another molecule12, restraining the charges toward zero13–15, (or to Mulliken or other less conformational‐dependent charges16, 17), or averaging the charges obtained for different conformations18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%