2005
DOI: 10.1002/bip.20231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational investigations on analogs of inflammation response inducing chemotactic tripeptide fMLP

Abstract: Conformations of three analogs of for-L-Met-L-Leu-L-Phe-OH (fMLP), which initiates inflammatory response by interaction with the formyl peptide receptor (FPR), have been investigated by the application of the X-ray crystallographic technique. The investigated analogs of fMLP peptides are as follows: for-L-Met-1-amino-1-cyclooctane-carbonyl(Ac8c)-L-Phe-OMe; for-L-Met-L-Leu-L-p-iodo-Phe-OH; and for-L-Met-di-n-propylglycyl(Dpg)-L-Phe-OMe. The peptide backbone in and is constrained at position of fMLP by the intro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that several authors have suggested this structure for many fMLP-OMe analogs, using spectroscopic X-ray and NMR methods as well as molecular modeling studies. 21,23-25,38-42. Fig.4a shows a stereoscopic view of the superposition of our β turn structure (conformer 2, table 1) with those found by Bardi for the Boc-Met-Aib-Phe-OMe analog 21 , Rathore for the f-Met-AC8C-Phe-OMe 38 and Zecchini for the f-Met-Δ Z Leu-Phe-OMe 39 . This figure shows that there is a great similarity at the backbone level and that the only differences with our structure lie just at the side chains orientation of Methionine and Phenylalanine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…It is worth noting that several authors have suggested this structure for many fMLP-OMe analogs, using spectroscopic X-ray and NMR methods as well as molecular modeling studies. 21,23-25,38-42. Fig.4a shows a stereoscopic view of the superposition of our β turn structure (conformer 2, table 1) with those found by Bardi for the Boc-Met-Aib-Phe-OMe analog 21 , Rathore for the f-Met-AC8C-Phe-OMe 38 and Zecchini for the f-Met-Δ Z Leu-Phe-OMe 39 . This figure shows that there is a great similarity at the backbone level and that the only differences with our structure lie just at the side chains orientation of Methionine and Phenylalanine.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Relevant and extensively studied among these functions are the catalyzed conversion of molecular oxygen to superoxide anion (O 2 − ) (respiratory burst) and the release of lysosomal enzymes. However, because of the complexity of the intracellular signaling pathways and the peculiar characteristics of the involved receptors, which are rapidly desensitized and internalized soon after the interaction with the ligand, several aspects concerning the involved biochemical mechanisms and the structure–activity relationships concerning N ‐formylpeptides are still scarcely understood and continue to be the object of active investigation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Schiffmann original discovery of the chemoattractant activity of N ‐formylpeptides , the tripeptide fMLF and its methyl ester For‐Met‐Leu‐Phe‐OMe (fMLF‐OMe) have been adopted as reference model for structure–activity relationships and conformational studies . Great attention has been dedicated to the role exerted by the N ‐formyl group and the Met residue at the first position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%