1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0268-9499(96)80082-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational changes in plasminogen, their effect on activation, and the agents that modulate activation rates — a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
66
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 C and E). The open form plasminogen is a better substrate for activation (37), and, given that plasminogen activators can activate single-chain HGF͞SF, preferential cleavage of the open form may also occur with single-chain HGF͞SF. As for receptor binding, the closed form of single-chain HGF͞SF is clearly unable to bind MET with both the nk1 and sp domains because of steric hindrance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 C and E). The open form plasminogen is a better substrate for activation (37), and, given that plasminogen activators can activate single-chain HGF͞SF, preferential cleavage of the open form may also occur with single-chain HGF͞SF. As for receptor binding, the closed form of single-chain HGF͞SF is clearly unable to bind MET with both the nk1 and sp domains because of steric hindrance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…that, in the absence of lysyl-type ligands, -60-80% of Glul-Pgn assumes a compact, "closed' shape while the rest is in an extended or "open" conformation (Markus, 1996 (Marshall et al, 1994) and -240 (Mangel et al, 1990), respectively, on the basis of the equilibrium open/close (= [K]/[K-NTP]) ratios given above and the estimated molecular volume, one obtains 0.47 < K, < 17.5 mM". Hence, the 2.3 < K, < 6.2 mM" values we have determined via 'H-NMR for the binding of CB-NTP to the isolated, intact kringles fall within range of the affinities that one may estimate from the independent data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformational change of gluplasminogen can be mediated by small lysine analogues and α-enolase (Markus, 1996;Andronicos et al, 2000). Whilst the binding of glu-plasminogen to cells is low affinity (Felez, 1998;Ranson et al, 1998) this study demonstrated that binding may also stabilise an activation-susceptible conformation of glu-plasminogen on the cell surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low affinity of glu-plasminogen binding has led to suggestions that binding is not important for activation. However, the fact remains that gluplasminogen activation is enhanced in the presence of small lysine analogues, cells and proteins and that this is attributable to a more open conformation of glu-plasminogen (Markus, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%