2020
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational Changes in Alkyl Chains Determine the Thermodynamic and Kinetic Binding Profiles of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

Abstract: Thermodynamics and kinetics of protein−ligand binding are both important aspects for the design of novel drug molecules. Presently, thermodynamic data are collected with isothermal titration calorimetry, while kinetic data are mostly derived from surface plasmon resonance. The new method of kinITC provides both thermodynamic and kinetic data from calorimetric titration measurements. The present study demonstrates the convenient collection of calorimetric data suitable for both thermodynamic and kinetic analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the final thermodynamic minimum 203 . These highly relevant data, which are in total contrast with the entire Matulis "intrinsic" theory, were thereafter validated by interesting work from the groups of Klebe 205,206 and Whitesides [207][208][209] , and are supported by our analysis of the hydrophobicity of the CA active site 204 as well as the report of several classes of inhibitors which anchor to zinc-bound hydroxide/water molecule 128 . Whitesides' group elegantly demonstrated using ITC, crystallography and MD that the differences in binding between homologous sulphonamide ligands stem from changes in the number and organisation of active site localised water molecules rather than (or perhaps in addition to) the release of structured water from the apposed hydrophobic surfaces 207 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the final thermodynamic minimum 203 . These highly relevant data, which are in total contrast with the entire Matulis "intrinsic" theory, were thereafter validated by interesting work from the groups of Klebe 205,206 and Whitesides [207][208][209] , and are supported by our analysis of the hydrophobicity of the CA active site 204 as well as the report of several classes of inhibitors which anchor to zinc-bound hydroxide/water molecule 128 . Whitesides' group elegantly demonstrated using ITC, crystallography and MD that the differences in binding between homologous sulphonamide ligands stem from changes in the number and organisation of active site localised water molecules rather than (or perhaps in addition to) the release of structured water from the apposed hydrophobic surfaces 207 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The values for k on ranged from 0.003 to 31 x 10 6 L À1 M À1 , whereas the k off range was exceedingly low, 0.01-0.05 s À1 . Thus, the inhibitory activity was entirely influenced by the association rate k on as also detailed by the groups of Klebe, Cavalli and Whitesides [203][204][205][206][207][208][209][210] , which depends primarily on hydrophobic effects. That is, another major error in the analysis of Matulis and colleagues is the lack of considering the hydrophobic effects when analysing the kinetics of association of the sulphonamide inhibitor within the active site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Notably, the coordination geometry enables a hydrogen bond between Nβ of the hydrazide group and the side chain hydroxy function of Thr199. This entails a different orientation of the phenyl moiety compared to the complex of hCAII with its prototypical inhibitor benzenesulfonamide 10 (BSA) [17], and triggers a flip of the sidechain of Leu198, which was also observed in the complex of hCAII with N-hydroxybenzamide (11) by Di Fiore et al (Figure 3) [27]. Unsurprisingly, sulfonamide 3 can be expected to bind to hCAII, and does so with the conventional geometry.…”
Section: Active-site Bindersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Crystals of protein complexes hCAII•1 to hCAII•9 were grown at 18 °C in a mixture of a solution containing 2.70 M ammonium sulfate and 0.1 M TRIS at pH 7.8, which was saturated with parachloromercuribenzoic acid (PCMB) and protein solution (c = 10 mg mL −1 ) in the final expression buffer (TRIS 0.05 M, pH 7.8). Then, 2 µL of each were mixed on a siliconized cover slip (Jena Bioscience) and placed on the well (24-well plate, Hampton Research), with silicon grease as sealant and 0.5 mL of the first solution in the reservoir [17]. Crystals grew within one day.…”
Section: Protein Expression and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small Chemicals, Polymers, and Minerals, [158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167] 9. Binding and Reaction Kinetics, 26,43,[168][169][170][171][172][173][174] 10. Process Development, [175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188] and 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%