1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4020(01)90680-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational analysis—CI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direction of rotation, as seen in Figure 2, presumably is a result of minimizing steric interactions since the a carbon, CP(6), is rotated away from the CF3 group positioned at C(3). The closest contact between the phenyl group and a fluorine atom is 3.123 (7) 8, for CP(6)-F (31). The closest contact between the phenyl group and a fluorine atom is 3.123 (7) 8, for CP(6)-F (31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direction of rotation, as seen in Figure 2, presumably is a result of minimizing steric interactions since the a carbon, CP(6), is rotated away from the CF3 group positioned at C(3). The closest contact between the phenyl group and a fluorine atom is 3.123 (7) 8, for CP(6)-F (31). The closest contact between the phenyl group and a fluorine atom is 3.123 (7) 8, for CP(6)-F (31).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The closest contact between a methyl carbon of the tert-butyl group and a fluorine atom is 3.22 (1) 8, for CP(2)-F (31). The nearly planar phenyl group, plane IX of Table IX, exhibits a dihedral angle of 17.1' (Table X) with the axial P-O(2)-O(4)-CP( 1) direction (plane IV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both high-level computational and experimental studies have indicated that these conformers are essentially isoenergetic. [17][18][19][20][21] This is presumably because steric repulsion by the methyl groups in the anti conformer destabilizes this structure. Dihedral angle drive calculations employing a number of different force fields implemented in the Maestro/Macromodel molecular mechanics package [22] indicate that all are able to reproduce this behavior both in the gas phase and when continuum solvation terms (GB/ SA water or chloroform) [23] are included in the calculation (data not shown).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many ideas and theories have been advanced to account for the interesting stereochemical control exhibited in these reactions (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). In contrast, however, much less attention has been paid to the matter of quantitatively predicting these stereochemical product ratios, with only two approaches, those of Wigfield (1 1) and of Wipke and Gund (12), having been presented in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%