1976
DOI: 10.1021/jo00886a026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformational analysis. 32. Conformational energies of methyl sulfide, methyl sulfoxide, and methyl sulfone groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The equatorial conformation was found to be more stable by 2.3 kcal·mol Ϫ1 . The good agreement with the A value given for a cyclohexyl methyl sulfone (2.5 kcal·mol Ϫ1 ) [17] shows the reliability of the AM1 calculations.…”
Section: Confirmation Of the Stereochemistrysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The equatorial conformation was found to be more stable by 2.3 kcal·mol Ϫ1 . The good agreement with the A value given for a cyclohexyl methyl sulfone (2.5 kcal·mol Ϫ1 ) [17] shows the reliability of the AM1 calculations.…”
Section: Confirmation Of the Stereochemistrysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…(a) Inversion of the cyclohexane ring is possible only for 1, because the tert-butyl group in 2 and 3 retains the equatorial position; its conformational energy ( A value) is much larger16 than that of any of the sulphur functions. [17][18][19] Even the smallest of these (SC6H5: 0.7-1.24 kcal rno1-I 17,19), however, shifts the conformational equilibrium of l a clearly to the equatorial side, so that its 'H and 13C NMR data (Table 1) are dominated by this rotamer. This is confirmed by a comparison of its 'H and 13C chemical shifts with those of 2a and 3a, although the signals which are most sensitive to the stereochemical position of the SC6H5 group (H-1 and C-3,s) seem to indicate the presence of a small proportion of the axial cyclohexyl phenyl sulphide.…”
Section: 'H and 13c Nmr And Stereochemical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an initial test, 4 was incorporated within a model peptide (Ac‐GPP X PPGY‐NH 2 ) that has been previously employed to quantify the polyproline II helix propensities of both canonical and unnatural amino acids . Using standard amide coupling conditions with HBTU as a coupling reagent, poor incorporation of 4 was observed, potentially due to the steric bulk resulting from β‐substitution with the sulfone . However, amide coupling proceeded effectively using COMU as a coupling reagent in the presence of catalytic DMAP (Scheme ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46][47][48] Using bulk resulting from β-substitution with the sulfone. [49,50] However, amide coupling proceeded effectively using COMU as a coupling reagent [51] in the presence of catalytic DMAP (Scheme 4). Alternatively, amide coupling was also accomplished using COMU and mild heating (40 C, 2 hours).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%