Conformal Geometry 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-90616-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conformal Geometry from the Riemannian Viewpoint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that a warped product I × f F with one-dimensional base is locally conformally flat if and only if the fiber is a space of constant sectional curvature. Local conformal flatness is independent of the warping function f [Lafontaine 1988], in opposition to the case of higher-dimensional base just considered. In what remains of this section we look at the local structure of a locally conformally flat multiply warped space with one-dimensional base.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recall that a warped product I × f F with one-dimensional base is locally conformally flat if and only if the fiber is a space of constant sectional curvature. Local conformal flatness is independent of the warping function f [Lafontaine 1988], in opposition to the case of higher-dimensional base just considered. In what remains of this section we look at the local structure of a locally conformally flat multiply warped space with one-dimensional base.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Here represents the Kulkarni-Nomizu product (see [Lafontaine 1988], for example). A nonflat locally decomposable Riemannian manifold is locally conformally flat if and only if it is locally equivalent to the product N (c)×‫ޒ‬ of an interval and a space of constant sectional curvature, or to the product…”
Section: Locally Conformally Flat Multiply Warped Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When n = 3, this means g N is flat. When n ≥ 4, because of the conformal flatness, g N is again flat (see [12]). Therefore Ω(Γ)/Γ must be covered by a flat torus.…”
Section: Theorem 5 ([13 Theorem 33])mentioning
confidence: 99%